ROC Imposes Penalty on Company and its Directors for Not Filing Financial Statement

The companies must file their adopted financial statements with the ROC through Form AOC-4 within 30 days of their Annual General Meeting (AGM).

Company Fined for Filing Lapses

Nidhi | Mar 20, 2026 |

ROC Imposes Penalty on Company and its Directors for Not Filing Financial Statement

ROC Imposes Penalty on Company and its Directors for Not Filing Financial Statement

The Registrar of Companies (ROC), Kolkata, has passed a penalty order against a company over the failure to file financial statements.

Based on the data at the MCA Portal, it was found that the company, Multi Purpose Bios India Limited, did not file its financial statements for the financial year 2022-23 with the ROC, violating the provisions of section 137 of the Companies Act. The ROC issued several notices, but the company neither replied nor submitted any documents.

As per section 137, the companies must file their adopted financial statements, including the consolidated statements, auditor’s report, and board reports, with the ROC through Form AOC-4 within 30 days of their Annual General Meeting (AGM).

Accordingly, the ROC imposed a fine of Rs 88,500 and Rs 50,000 each on its 2 directors. The directors must correct the default and pay the penalty within 90 days through the ‘e-Adjudication’ facility available on the MCA portal.

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"


Tags: ROC


Author Bio
My Recent Articles
Dr. Reddy’s Russian Subsidiary Gets Major Relief as Penalty Reduced to Rs 11.40 Million Substantial Justice Should be Preferred Over Technical Delay in Appeal Filing: ITAT Reassessment Beyond 3 Years Invalid Without Higher Authority Approval: ITAT Quashes Reopening Notices Apollo Tyres Faces GST Penalty for E-way Bill, Says No Major Financial Impact Second Reopening Invalid if Based on Change of Opinion: ITATView All Posts