ROC levies penalty of Rs. 20 Lakhs for Non-Appointment of Company Secretary

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has levied a penalty of Rs. 20 Lakhs for Non-Appointment of Company Secretary.

ROC levies penalty of Rs. 20 Lakhs

Reetu | Dec 13, 2023 |

ROC levies penalty of Rs. 20 Lakhs for Non-Appointment of Company Secretary

ROC levies penalty of Rs. 20 Lakhs for Non-Appointment of Company Secretary

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) in the matter of SOLIS PHARMACHEN PRIVATE LIMITED has levied a penalty of Rs. 20 Lakhs for the Non-Appointment of Company Secretary.

M/S. SOLIS PHARMACHEM PRIVATE LIMITED (hereinafter referred to as “Company”) is a company registered under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956/2013 in the State of Gujarat on 03.12.2019, having CIN: U24100GJ2019PTC111161 and presently having its registered office situated at “Plot No. 4707/A/5 Sentogen Plot, Near Lyka Chokdi, Bharuch, Ankleshwar, Gujarat, India, 393002”.

Facts of the Case

A suo-moto application filed by the company in GNL-1 vide SRN F63476352 dated 25.08 2023, the Company has issued only one Class of Shares i.e. Equity Shares having a face value of Rs. 10 Each and having the right to vote. The classification of the Company’s Share Capital in terms of its Authorized Share capital and issued, subscribed and paid-up Share Capital are as under:

A. The Authorized Capital: Presently, the Authorized Share Capital of the Company is Rs. 25,00,00,000 (Two Crore Fifty Lac) Equity shares of Rs. 10 (Rupees Ten) each; and

B. Issued, Subscribed and Paid up Share Capital: The issued, subscribed capital and Paid-up Share Capital of the Company is Rs. 24,75,79,000 (Rupees Twenty-four Crore Seventy Five Lac Seventy Nine Thousand Only) divided into 2,47,57,900 (Two Crore Forty-seven Lac Fifty-seven Thousand Nine Hundred only) Equity shares of Rs. 10 (Rupees Ten) each.

The presenting officer has submitted that the matter is fit for further proceedings as the company and its Officers in default are liable for penalty under section 203(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 for non-compliance with Section 203 of the company viz. SOLIS PHARMA CHEM PRIVATE LIMITED in the financial Year 2022-23 and 2023-24.

It is further submitted that there is reasonable ground to believe that the company and its officers in default have violated the provisions of Section 203 of the Companies Act, 2013 as noticed though the company has filed a suo-motto application for adjudication. In view of the facts narrated above, the company and its directors/ officers, in default are liable for a penalty under Section 203(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Rules, made thereunder.

The Presenting Officer further submitted that it is observed from the Balance Sheet/ Financial statement as at 31.03.2023 the paid-up capital of the company is Rs. 24,75,79,000 and Turnover is Rs. 4,25,37,779. Hence, as per the Ministry’s Notification No. G.S.R. 700(E) dated 15.09.2022, in light of Companies (Specification of definition details) Amendment Rules, 2022 with respect to the provisions of Section 2(85) of the Companies Act, 2013, the company does not fall under the ambit of “small company”. Therefore, the provisions of imposing lesser penalty as per the provisions of Section 446B of the Companies Act, 2013 shall not be applied to the company.

ORDER

While adjudging the quantum of penalty under Section 203(5) of the Companies Act, 2013, the Adjudicating Officer shall have due regard to the following factors, namely,

a. The amount of disproportionate gain or unfair advantage, whenever quantifiable, made as a result of default.

b. The amount of loss caused to an investor or group of investors as a result of the default.

c. The repetitive nature of default.

With regard to the above factors to be considered while determining the quantum of penalty, it is noted that the disproportionate gain or unfair advantage made by the notice or loss caused to the investor as a result of the delay on the part of the notice to redress the investor grievance are not available on the record. Further, it may also be added that it is difficult to quantify the unfair advantage made by the notice or the loss caused to the investors in a default of this nature.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the presenting Officer and after taking into account the facts cited above, the undersigned has reasonable cause to believe that the company and its officers in default have failed to comply with the Provisions of Section 203 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Hereby, a penalty of Rs. 7,12,000 is to be imposed for default.

AO is of the opinion that the penalty is commensurate with the aforesaid default committed by the Noticees:

The company/Officer is further directed to rectify the default failing which this office shall be proceeded further the matter in pursuant to Section 454A of the Companies Act, 2013 for the non-compliance of the aforesaid provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

The noticees shall pay the amount of penalty individually for the company and its officers from their personal sources/ income by way of e-payment available on Ministry Website under “Pay Miscellaneous fees” category in MCA fee and payment Services under Rule 3(14) of Company (Adjudication of Penalties) (Amendment) Rules, 2019 within 60 days from the date of receipt of this order and copy of this adjudication order and Challan/SRN generated after payment of penalty through online mode shall be filed in INC-28 under the MCA portal without further reference.

For Official Order Download PDF Given Below:

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
Massive Tax Fraud: Kerala Scrap Sector sees Rs.1000 Crore Business using Fake GST Bills, Evaded Rs.180 Crore in Tax ICICI Lombard receive GST Show Cause Notice of Rs.288 Crore GST on Love, Vidya Balan’s humorous Video goes viral ED Arrests Businessman in Rs.263 Crore Income Tax Refund Fraud Madras HC quashed GST Demand Notice of Rs.96 Crore to Chennai MetrowaterView All Posts