Services received from overseas commission agent is not chargeable to GST under RCM as place of supply is outside India

Services received from overseas commission agent is not chargeable to GST under RCM as place of supply is outside India The Hon’ble Uttarakhand Autho…

Services received from overseas commission agent is not chargeable to GST under RCM as place of supply is outside India
The Hon’ble Uttarakhand Authority for Advance Rulings (“UAAR”), in the matter of M/s. Midas Foods (P.) Ltd. [Application No. 05 of 2020-21 dated October 15, 2020], held that Overseas Commission Agent is covered within the definition of the term ‘intermediary’ under Section 2(13) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the IGST Act”). Service received by the assessee from Overseas Commission Agent do not fall within the meaning of term ‘import of services’ under Section 2(11) of the IGST Act as place of supply is outside India, hence the assessee is not required to pay GST on Reverse Charge Mechanism (“RCM”) basis under Section 5(3) of the IGST Act on commission paid to Overseas Commission Agent. (“OCA”)
Facts:
M/s. Midas Foods (P.) Ltd. (“the Applicant”) is a supplier of goods and carries on business of supply of seasoning, spices, premixes and similar food products to its customers located within and outside India.
The Applicant entered into an agreement with OCA located outside India to arrange supply of the Applicant's goods outside India. For such facilitation, the Applicant would pay commission to OCA, ranging from 10-15% on the basis of Free on Board (“FOB”) value of the consignment exported outside India.
The Applicant has sought an advance ruling on classification and determination of liability to pay tax on supply of services.
Issue:
- Whether OCA is covered within the definition of the term 'intermediary' as provided under Section 2(13) of the IGST Act?
- Whether services received by Applicant from OCA falls within the meaning of the term 'import of services' as provided under Section 2(11) of the IGST Act?
- Whether the Applicant is required to pay Goods and Services Tax (“GST”) on RCM basis under Section 5(3) of the IGST Act on commission paid to the OCA?
- Observed that, any person who enables the supply of goods/services between two persons, is considered as intermediary. As per the provisions of Section 2(13) of the IGST Act, OCA falls within the definition of ‘intermediary’.
- Further observed that, as per the provisions of the Section 2(11) of the IGST Act, the services received by the Applicant is out of the ambit of “import of services” read with the provisions of Section 13(8) (b) of IGST Act as place of supply of service is out of India since the location of OCA, a intermediary, is UAE.
- Noted that, intermediary services provided by the OCA is out of ambit of ‘import of services’ as per the provisions of Section 2(11) of the IGST Act, accordingly GST under RCM is not payable by the Applicant under provisions of Section 5(3) of the IGST Act on the commission paid for intermediary services to the OCA.
- Held that, OCA is covered within the ambit of term ‘intermediary’ as per the provisions of section 2(13) of the IGST Act.
- Further held that, services received by the Applicant from the OCA do not fall within the meaning of the term 'import of services' as provided under Section 2(11) of the IGST Act as place of supply is outside India. Accordingly, the Applicant is not required to pay GST on RCM basis under section 5(3) of the IGST Act on commission paid to the OCA.
About Author

A2ZBimal Jain
Chartered Accountant
CA Bimal Jain is a Member of Institute of Chartered Accountants of India since May 1994 and Member of Institute of Company Secretaries of India since December 2006 along with a Bachelors degree in Law. Also, he is a Qualified SAP - FI/CO Consultant and has more than 21 years of experience in Indirect Taxation and specializes in all aspects of Service Tax, Value Added Tax (VAT)/ Central Sales Tax (CST), Central Excise, Customs, Foreign Trade Policy (FTP), Special Economic Zone (SEZ), Export Oriented Unit (EOU), Export-Import Laws and well acquainted with the concept and impact of way forward Goods and Services tax (GST).
A2Z Taxcorp LLP
Delhi, Delhi, India
468My Recent Articles
- Actions taken by the department during enquiry need not necessarily be termed as harassment
- Who are liable to generate e-invoice w.e.f October 1, 2022
- Personal penalty cannot be imposed on the Chairman of the Company for failure in ensuring proper accounting of the goods
- Stayed the order of cancellation of GST Registration of the assessee for continuing the trading activities
- Can CA be arrested- Section 69 vs Section 132 of the CGST Act
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








