TDS credit to be allowed to Employee even if not deposited by the Employer

TDS credit to be allowed to Employee even if not deposited by the Employer The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Kartik Vijaysinh Sonavane v. Deputy Comm…
Table of Contents

TDS credit to be allowed to Employee even if not deposited by the Employer
The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Kartik Vijaysinh Sonavane v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax [R/Special Civil Application No. 6193 of 2021 dated November 15, 2021] directed the Income-Tax Department (“the Department”) to allow tax deducted at source (“TDS”) credit to the assessee, even if the same is not deposited by the employer. Further held that, where tax has been deducted by an employer but not paid to the Central Government, the Department should resort to Section 201 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“IT Act”) to recover TDS from the employer.
Facts:
Kartik Vijaysinh Sonavane (“the Petitioner”) is a pilot with Kingfisher Airlines (“the Employer”) that deducted TDS from the salary income of the Petitioner amounting to INR 7,20,100/- for the Assessment Year 2009-10 and INR 8,70,757/- for the Assessment Year 2011-12 respectively. However, the TDS amount had not been deposited by the Employer in the Central Government Account. Accordingly, the TDS credit as claimed by the Petitioner was denied by the Assessing Officer (“the Respondent”/ “AO”). The Respondent raised demand vide several demand notices with interest and initiated recovery proceedings. Being aggrieved, the Petitioner has filed this writ petition against recovery notices.Issue:
Whether the Respondent can deny the benefit of TDS deducted by the Employer during the relevant financial years?Held:
The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in R/Special Civil Application No. 6193 of 2021 dated November 15, 2021 held as under:- Relied on its own decision in case of Devarsh Pravinbhai Patel v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 5(1)(1) [R/Special Civil Application No. 12965 of 2018 with R/Special Civil Application No. 12966 of 2018 dated September 24, 2018] wherein, the Court allowed the petition filed by the assessee, who was an employee of the Kingfisher Airlines and worked as a pilot and the TDS on the salary paid to the assessee had not been deposited, and the Department raised the tax demand with interest and initiated the actions of the recovery.
- Opined that, no separate reasoning are desirable as the facts being almost identical.
- Observed that, a perusal of Section 205 of the IT Act clarifies that where tax is deductible at source, the assessee shall not be called upon to pay the tax himself to the extent to which tax has been deducted from that income. Further, if the amount has been deducted but not paid to the Central Government, that eventuality is taken care of by Section 201 of the IT Act. It is not permissible to proceed against the assessee even after deduction of TDS.
- Held that, the Department is precluded from denying the benefit of the TDS by the employer during the relevant financial years to the Petitioner.
- Directed the Respondent to credit the tax to the Petitioner and in case of any recovery or adjustments, the Petitioner shall be entitled to a refund of the same along with the statutory interest, within 8 weeks.
About Author

A2ZBimal Jain
Chartered Accountant
CA Bimal Jain is a Member of Institute of Chartered Accountants of India since May 1994 and Member of Institute of Company Secretaries of India since December 2006 along with a Bachelors degree in Law. Also, he is a Qualified SAP - FI/CO Consultant and has more than 21 years of experience in Indirect Taxation and specializes in all aspects of Service Tax, Value Added Tax (VAT)/ Central Sales Tax (CST), Central Excise, Customs, Foreign Trade Policy (FTP), Special Economic Zone (SEZ), Export Oriented Unit (EOU), Export-Import Laws and well acquainted with the concept and impact of way forward Goods and Services tax (GST).
A2Z Taxcorp LLP
Delhi, Delhi, India
468My Recent Articles
- Actions taken by the department during enquiry need not necessarily be termed as harassment
- Who are liable to generate e-invoice w.e.f October 1, 2022
- Personal penalty cannot be imposed on the Chairman of the Company for failure in ensuring proper accounting of the goods
- Stayed the order of cancellation of GST Registration of the assessee for continuing the trading activities
- Can CA be arrested- Section 69 vs Section 132 of the CGST Act
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
Recent Posts

All Posts








