Third-Party Excel Sheets Without Corroboration Cannot Justify Income Tax Additions

ITAT Rules Against Additions Based on "Dumb Documents" Found During Builder Search

ITAT: Section 69 Addition Unsustainable on Third-Party Excel Sheet Alone

Meetu Kumari | Feb 28, 2026 |

Third-Party Excel Sheets Without Corroboration Cannot Justify Income Tax Additions

Third-Party Excel Sheets Without Corroboration Cannot Justify Income Tax Additions

The assessee, Shri Kamalkumar Ramkumar Agarwal, filed his return for A.Y. 2016-17 declaring an income of Rs. 15,26,480. His case was later reopened based on information from a search conducted on the Navratna Organisers and Developers Pvt. Ltd. (NODPL) group. During that search, an Excel sheet was recovered from a laptop belonging to an employee, which allegedly contained coded entries of “on-money” made by property buyers.

The Assessing Officer (AO) correlated these entries with the assessee’s purchase of a villa in the ‘Kalhaar Blues and Greens’ project and concluded that Rs. 56,60,500 was paid in cash over and above the registered sale deed value. This amount was added to the assessee’s income as unexplained investment under Section 69. The CIT(A) upheld the addition, prompting the assessee to move the Tribunal.

Issue Before Tribunal: Whether an addition can be made under Section 69 solely based on an unsigned, unverified Excel sheet recovered from a third party (the builder’s employee) without any independent corroborative evidence linking the assessee to the alleged cash payment.

ITAT Held: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the appeal and deleted the addition of Rs. 56,60,500. The Bench observed that the entire case rested on a third-party Excel sheet that did not bear the name or signature of the assessee. The Revenue failed to provide any independent evidence, such as cash withdrawals from the assessee’s accounts or any acknowledgement of receipt.

The Tribunal noted that the developer’s admission before the Settlement Commission could not automatically fasten liability on the assessee without positive proof of his involvement. Relying on PCIT v. Kaushik Nanubhai Majithia, the Tribunal held that “dumb documents” found with third parties lack evidentiary value unless corroborated. The denial of cross-examination of the person who prepared the Excel sheet was held to be a violation of the principles of natural justice.

To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
High Court Rejects Importer’s Plea to Halt Cargo Arrival and Manifest Filing High Court: Refund of GST Paid Twice Cannot Be Denied on Limitation; Article 265 Overrides Section 54 Third-Party Excel Sheets Without Corroboration Cannot Justify Income Tax Additions Supreme Court Holds ‘Sharbat Rooh Afza’ Taxable as Fruit Drink at 4% Under UPVAT, Not Residuary 12.5% Tax Authorities Can’t Reopen Assessments Based on Change of Opinion Without New Tangible EvidenceView All Posts