Uttarakhand High Court Quashed GST Demand Order for Failure to Grant Personal Hearing:

Uttarakhand High Court Quashed GST Demand Order for Failure to Grant Personal Hearing

The Uttarakhand HC has quashed a GST demand order passed under Section 74 of the UK GST Act after finding that the assessee was not afforded an opportunity of a personal hearing before the adjudication.

Uttarakhand HC Sets Aside Section 74 Order After Revenue Admits Violation

authorSaimadateJun 8, 2026
Last update on Jun 8, 2026
Uttarakhand High Court Quashed GST Demand Order for Failure to Grant Personal Hearing The Uttarakhand High Court quashed the impugned order passed under Section 74 of the UK GST Act, as the assessee was not heard personally, violating Section 75(4) of the Act and principles of natural justice.
Delhi High Court Upholds 7-Day Notice Before GST Arrest in Rs 8 Crore ITC Fraud Case
The petitioner, Sunny Kumar, approached the Uttarakhand High Court challenging an order dated 2nd July 2025 passed by the state GST authorities under Section 74 of the Uttarakhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner contended that the adjudication order had been passed without fixing any date for a personal hearing and without providing an effective opportunity for the petitioner to present his case effectively. The show cause notice dated 7th July 2023 was referred to, and it did not mention any date of hearing. The State’s counsel admitted that the impugned order had been passed without providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. It was admitted that such action was contrary to the mandate of Section 75(4) of the UKGST Act. The Division Bench held that the adjudication order caused a clear violation of the statutory requirement prescribed under Section 75(4) of the Act.
Supreme Court Quashes CCI’s Rs 202 Crore Penalty on Amazon
The court observed that the show cause notice itself did not specify any date for a personal hearing, and the revenue had also accepted that no hearing was granted before passing the order. Consequently, the impugned order dated 2nd July 2025 could not be sustained in law and quashed the order and reaffirmed that the opportunity of personal hearing contemplated under Section 75(4) of the GST law is a mandatory safeguard. Any adjudication order passed under Section 74 without granting such an opportunity violates statutory provisions as well as principles of natural justice and is liable to be set aside.
Allahabad HC: Retired Employee Entitled to Interest on Delayed Pensionary Benefits; Administrative Delays Cannot Prejudice Retiree
The Uttarakhand High Court also granted liberty to the revenue authorities to proceed afresh on the basis of the existing show cause notice after providing an adequate opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. All pending applications were also disposed of.

About Author

Saima

Content Writer

Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
132
Up Next

Loading suggestions…