This weekly update covers the most important Judgement pieces published on Studycafe in the previous week, from July 10 to July 15, 2023.
Reetu | Jul 17, 2023 |
Weekly Judgments Compilation from July 10 to July 15, 2023
This weekly update covers the most important Judgement pieces published on Studycafe in the previous week, from July 10 to July 15, 2023.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal(ITAT) Delhi in the matter of M/s G.D. Foods and Manufacturing vs Assistant Director of Income Tax has opined that when the due date for depositing the contribution of ESIC & EPF falls on Sunday and gazetted holiday, the said delay of one day deserves to be condoned as per Section 10 of General Clauses Act.
Case: M/s G.D. Foods and Manufacturing vs Assistant Director of Income Tax(ITAT Delhi); ITA No.221/Del/2023; 2019-20; 10/07/2023
To Read More – Click Here
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in the matter of Sheel Agarwal vs Income Tax Office has deleted the penalty order for Non-Filing of Income Tax Return (ITR) passed u/s 144 and order u/s 271F of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Case: Sheel Agarwal Vs. Income Tax Office(ITAT Delhi); ITA No. 123/Del/2023; 2012-13; 2012-13
To Read More – Click Here
The applicant is engaged in the manufacture, sale and trading of automotive parts and provides products and services to the Indian and global automotive OEMs as well as other Tier I suppliers.
Case: In re. Tata Autocomp Systems Ltd (AAR Gujarat); GUJ/GAAR/R/2O23/23; 19.06.2023
To Read More – Click Here
The Applicant is a flour miller, engaged in providing services of crushing wheat provided by the State Government, into fortified atta which in turn is supplied by the State Government through Public Distribution System. The ownership of wheat or atta is never transferred to the Applicant.
Case: In re. MURSHIDABAD FLOUR MILL PRIVATE LIMITED(AAR West Bengal); 12/WBAAR/2022-23; 26.06.2023
To Read More – Click Here
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal(ITAT) Delhi in the matter of Amar Nath Vs. ITO has noted that assessee was maintaining two sets of books of accounts which were impounded during the course of survey proceedings and it was found that assessee has made out of books sales amounting to Rs. 77,25,354/- upon which addition on gross profit @ 3.19% of Rs. 77,35,354/- was made. That certainly amounts to under reporting of incoming consequence to misreporting by way of misrepresentation of facts.
Case : Amar Nath Vs. ITO(ITAT Delhi); ITA No. 74/Del/2023, 2017-18; 10.07.2023
To Read More – Click Here
The High Court of Madras in the matter Shanthi Umesh vs. DGGI Additional Director has held that GST Department seal house property in absence of petitioner staying in it.
Case: Shanthi Umesh vs. DGGI Additional Director(Madras High Court); W.P.No.20474 of 2023; 11.07.2023
To Read More – Click Here
The Bombay High Court in the matter of Media Net Software Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors. held that State GST Department lacks jurisdiction to retain the amount of tax on export transactions.
Case: Media Net Software Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors.(Bombay High Court); WRIT PETITION NO. 749 OF 2021; 05.07.2023
To Read More – Click Here
Heard Sri Anup Trivedi, learned senior counsel assisted by Shri Vineet Bhatia and Shri Abhinav Gaur, learned counsels for the applicant and Sri Dhananjay Awasthi, learned counsel for Union of India and perused the material on record.
Case: Ravinder Nath Sharma Vs. Union of India(Allahabad High Court); CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. – 26376 of 2023; 10.7.2023
To Read More – Click Here
Honorable High Court in the matter of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-2. Kolkata Versus M/S. Industrial Safety Products Private Limited has retreated the decision of the High Court of Karnataka which was affirmed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the decision reported in (2016) 73 Taxmann.com 248 (SC) that that the imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act is bad in law and invalid for the reasons where the show cause notice under Section 274 of Act did not specify the charge against the assessee as to whether it is for concealment of particulars of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income.
Case: PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. M/S. INDUSTRIAL SAFETY PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED(Calcutta High Court); ITAT/88/2022; 03.07.2023
To Read More – Click Here
In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]
Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"
