Writ Petition Allowed: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Orders for Denial of Fair Hearing:

The Allahabad High Court has quashed both the GST orders and remanded the case back to the AO for fresh consideration.
HC Set Asides GST Orders Due to Lack of Personal Hearing

Writ Petition Allowed: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Orders for Denial of Fair Hearing
The present writ petition is being filed by a company named M/S Swati Auto Spares (Petitioner) in Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, before Hon’ble Justice Pankaj Bhatia in Court No. 7, against the State of Uttar Pradesh (Respondent). The case was decided on July 15, 2025. Petitioner here is challenging two orders dated 12.12.2023 and 29.03.2025, respectively. The first order was passed under Section 73 of the GST Act, and the second order was issued to reject their appeal against the previous order. The reason given for rejection was “delay beyond limitation.”
The petitioner claimed that they were not given the opportunity of a personal hearing before the final order under Section 73 of the GST Act. On this point, the government agreed that the taxpayer was asked to reply and appear on the same day, which does not really give a fair opportunity to prepare and be heard.
To issue the final order, the court recalled a previous case titled Mahaveer Trading Company vs. Deputy Commissioner, State Tax (Writ Tax No. 303 of 2024), decided on 04.03.2024. In this case also, the taxpayer was not given a fair chance of hearing, and hence, the court quashed the order. The same principle applied in this case, too. Therefore, the court allowed the writ petition and set aside both the assessment and appeal rejection orders dated 12.12.2023 and 29.03.2025, respectively. The matter is now remanded back to the assessing officer (AO) for fresh consideration, this time awarding a fair chance of hearing to the petitioner. The case is not closed.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2484My Recent Articles
- ITAT Says Identity and Creditworthiness Irrelevant Where Loan Was Directly Paid to Haryana Mining DepartmentPremium
- Earlier Rejection Cannot Be Sole Ground to Reject Fresh Section 12AB and 80G Registration Applications, Says ITATPremium
- Cash Deposited During Demonetisation Cannot Be Taxed Under Section 69A if Linked to Business, Holds ITAT Premium
- ITAT Condones 1,731-Day Delay, Remands Cancer Trust's Section 12A Registration Application for Fresh ConsiderationPremium
- ITAT Lowers Estimated Profit Rate from 8% to 4% After Considering State Shutdown and Medicine Trade MarginsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








