Writ Petition Allowed: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Orders for Denial of Fair Hearing:

The Allahabad High Court has quashed both the GST orders and remanded the case back to the AO for fresh consideration.
HC Set Asides GST Orders Due to Lack of Personal Hearing

Writ Petition Allowed: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Orders for Denial of Fair Hearing
The present writ petition is being filed by a company named M/S Swati Auto Spares (Petitioner) in Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, before Hon’ble Justice Pankaj Bhatia in Court No. 7, against the State of Uttar Pradesh (Respondent). The case was decided on July 15, 2025. Petitioner here is challenging two orders dated 12.12.2023 and 29.03.2025, respectively. The first order was passed under Section 73 of the GST Act, and the second order was issued to reject their appeal against the previous order. The reason given for rejection was “delay beyond limitation.”
The petitioner claimed that they were not given the opportunity of a personal hearing before the final order under Section 73 of the GST Act. On this point, the government agreed that the taxpayer was asked to reply and appear on the same day, which does not really give a fair opportunity to prepare and be heard.
To issue the final order, the court recalled a previous case titled Mahaveer Trading Company vs. Deputy Commissioner, State Tax (Writ Tax No. 303 of 2024), decided on 04.03.2024. In this case also, the taxpayer was not given a fair chance of hearing, and hence, the court quashed the order. The same principle applied in this case, too. Therefore, the court allowed the writ petition and set aside both the assessment and appeal rejection orders dated 12.12.2023 and 29.03.2025, respectively. The matter is now remanded back to the assessing officer (AO) for fresh consideration, this time awarding a fair chance of hearing to the petitioner. The case is not closed.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2702My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condoned Delay After Noting Indeed Technical Glitch on E-filing Portal and Restores Section 12A and 80G ApplicationsPremium
- ITAT Rejects Section 69A Unexplained Money Addition Based on Alleged Over-Invoicing Entry Found in Third-Party SearchPremium
- ITAT Condoned 336-Day Delay in Section 68 Case After Taxpayer Cites Lack Of Online Communication AwarenessPremium
- United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax Dispute
- Aries Agro Faces Rs 3.96 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Availment from Retrospectively Cancelled Vendors
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts








