Wrong Head of Income Is Not Misreporting: ITAT Quashes Rs. 2.48 Crore Penalty:

Wrong Head of Income Is Not Misreporting: ITAT Quashes Rs. 2.48 Crore Penalty

ITAT Holds Section 270A Penalty Not Leviable Where Income Is Fully Disclosed but Offered Under Incorrect Head

ITAT: No Section 270A Penalty for Offering Income Under Wrong Head

authorMeetu KumaridateDec 28, 2025
Last update on Dec 28, 2025
Wrong Head of Income Is Not Misreporting: ITAT Quashes Rs. 2.48 Crore Penalty The assessee, Shri Penninti Vivekananda Rao, a non-resident individual, filed his return for AY 2020-21 declaring total income of Rs. 5.20 crore, including capital gains of Rs. 3.22 crore arising from surrender of three Bajaj Allianz Equity Plus Fund policies purchased between 2004 and 2006. The case was selected for complete scrutiny. The Assessing Officer held that the gains from surrender of the policies were taxable as “Income from Other Sources” and not as “Capital Gains”. Penalty proceedings under Section 270A were initiated for alleged misreporting of income. The assessee’s application for immunity under Section 270AA was rejected, and a penalty of Rs. 2.48 crore was levied. The CIT(A) upheld the penalty. The assessee appealed to the ITAT.
Partner’s Remuneration Eligible for Presumptive Taxation Under Section 44ADA
Issue Before ITAT: Whether penalty under Section 270A(9) for misreporting can be levied where income is fully disclosed but offered under an incorrect head of income. ITAT's Order: The ITAT deleted the penalty. It held that the assessee had fully and correctly disclosed the income from surrender of the policies in the return, and the dispute was confined only to the head of taxation. Misreporting under Section 270A(9) applies only to specified situations such as suppression of facts, false entries, or failure to record receipts, none of which were present.
Kerala High Court Quashes Service Tax on Amusement Parks as Unconstitutional
The Tribunal held that offering income under an incorrect head, based on a bona fide claim, does not amount to misreporting. Penalty under Section 270A is not automatic, and a rejected legal claim by itself cannot attract penal consequences. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2166
Up Next

Loading suggestions…