AAR: E-Way Bill Queries Not Admissible Under Section 97(2):

Gujarat AAR rules that e-way bill queries fall outside the scope of Advance Ruling under Section 97(2).
AAR Denies Clarification on E-Way Bill Applicability

AAR: E-Way Bill Queries Not Admissible Under Section 97(2)
The present application has been filed by M/s. Nemi Niva Agro Enterprise (Applicant) before the Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling Goods and Services Tax, D/5, Rajya Kar Bhavan, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad.
The Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling Goods and Services Tax, D/5, Rajya Kar Bhavan, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad (AAR) issued Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/R/2025/56 arguing that e-way bills can be taken up for Advance Ruling because the rules about e-way bills were brought into force through a Notification issued by the government.
The company deals with seasonal agro-based products and has multiple godowns for procuring material at several locations in Gujarat. However, the company is not registered under GST because their turnover is less than the threshold limit.
Questions asked by the applicant
Following are the questions asked by the applicant, seeking Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling:
"Question 1: Is it compulsory to generate an e-way bill for the movement of goods from one of my godowns in the city to another godown in the same state?
Question 2: Is it compulsory to generate an e-way bill while selling goods from my place/godown to an unregistered person in Gujarat State?"
AAR's decision on the classification
The Gujarat Authority For Advance Ruling on Goods and Services Tax gave the following answers to the questions asked by the applicant.
Answer: The Authority disagreed with both the questions and stated that Section 97(2)(b) of the CGST Act allows Advance Rulings on the applicability of any notification. The authority also explains that every rule under the CGST Rules, 2017 not just e-way bill rules, was introduced through notifications. Further added that any notification connected to e-way bills cannot be taken up under Advance Ruling.
About Author
Vanshika verma
Content Writer
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Studycafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
1641My Recent Articles
- ITAT Pune Sends Tax Dispute Back to CIT(A) Over Rule 46A ViolationPremium
- ITAT Sets Aside Ex Parte Rejection of Section 12A and 80G Applications, Orders Fresh HearingPremium
- ITAT Cancels Rs 9.27 Lakh Penalty, Directs Tax Department to Grant Immunity to AssesseePremium
- ITAT Sends Cooperative Society’s Section 80P Interest Claim Back to AO for Fresh ExaminationPremium
- ITAT Remands Rs 38.98 Crore Unexplained Cash Deposit Dispute to AO for Fresh VerificationPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
Recent Posts

All Posts








