AAR: E-Way Bill Queries Not Admissible Under Section 97(2):

Gujarat AAR rules that e-way bill queries fall outside the scope of Advance Ruling under Section 97(2).
AAR Denies Clarification on E-Way Bill Applicability

AAR: E-Way Bill Queries Not Admissible Under Section 97(2)
The present application has been filed by M/s. Nemi Niva Agro Enterprise (Applicant) before the Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling Goods and Services Tax, D/5, Rajya Kar Bhavan, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad.
The Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling Goods and Services Tax, D/5, Rajya Kar Bhavan, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad (AAR) issued Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/R/2025/56 arguing that e-way bills can be taken up for Advance Ruling because the rules about e-way bills were brought into force through a Notification issued by the government.
The company deals with seasonal agro-based products and has multiple godowns for procuring material at several locations in Gujarat. However, the company is not registered under GST because their turnover is less than the threshold limit.
Questions asked by the applicant
Following are the questions asked by the applicant, seeking Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling:
"Question 1: Is it compulsory to generate an e-way bill for the movement of goods from one of my godowns in the city to another godown in the same state?
Question 2: Is it compulsory to generate an e-way bill while selling goods from my place/godown to an unregistered person in Gujarat State?"
AAR's decision on the classification
The Gujarat Authority For Advance Ruling on Goods and Services Tax gave the following answers to the questions asked by the applicant.
Answer: The Authority disagreed with both the questions and stated that Section 97(2)(b) of the CGST Act allows Advance Rulings on the applicability of any notification. The authority also explains that every rule under the CGST Rules, 2017 not just e-way bill rules, was introduced through notifications. Further added that any notification connected to e-way bills cannot be taken up under Advance Ruling.
About Author
Vanshika verma
Content Writer
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Studycafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
1872My Recent Articles
- Two-Day Delay Not Enough to Deny Justice: ITAT Restores Tax Appeal for Fresh Decision on MeritsPremium
- Rs 4.36 Crore Cash Deposits Trigger Tax Dispute: ITAT Orders Fresh Verification of Stamp-Duty Collection and E-Challan RecordsPremium
- ITAT Gives Fresh Opportunity for 80G Approval, Sets Aside Rejection Over Assessment Year Selection ErrorPremium
- Tax Dispute Over Cash, Jewellery and Property Deals Gets Fresh Lease of Life as ITAT Orders ReconsiderationPremium
- ITAT Holds Repeated Notices Seeking Same Information Cannot Automatically Constitute Separate DefaultsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Tags
Recent Posts
All Posts








