Allahabad High Court Declines to Interfere with GST Cess Show Cause Notice And Directs Assessee to Avail Statutory Remedies:

The Allahabad High Court has dismissed a writ petition filed by M/s Dev Trading Company challenging a show cause notice issued under the Health Security se National Security Cess Rules, 2026.
Wrong Rubber Stamp or Mere Issuance of Show Cause Notice Does Not Invalidate Jurisdiction

Allahabad High Court Declines to Interfere with GST Cess Show Cause Notice And Directs Assessee to Avail Statutory Remedies
The Allahabad High Court dismissed the Writ Petition and held that the assessee must first pursue the statutory remedy by filing objections. M/s Dev Trading Company challenged the show cause notice dated 16th April 2026 and the corrigendum notice dated 4 May 2026 issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Central GST, Division-I, Kanpur, under the Health Security and National Security Cess Rules, 2026.
The petitioner pleaded that it had already informed the authorities in February 2026 about its intention to manufacture Pan Masala manually and later, the declarations were filed regarding the proposed use of one machine from March 2026 and a second machine from April 2026. Despite these declarations, the department has assumed installation of two machines and initiated proceedings demanding cessation.
It was contended by the petitioner after referring to CBIC Orders Nos. 01/2026 and 02/2026 dated 29 January 2026 that the officers functioning under the CGST Act lacked jurisdiction to issue notices under the Health Security and National Security Cess Act, 2025. The Court observed that the notice merely contained a proposal to demand cess and did not amount to a final determination.
With respect to the objection regarding jurisdiction, the Court held the impugned orders have vested Deputy Commissioners and Assistant Commissioners with jurisdiction under the CGST Act and Rule 11 of the Health Security and National Security Cess Rules, 2026. The Bench also noted that the show cause notice did not reveal any finality of opinion and that the allegations would be subject to consideration after the petitioner's objections were examined.
The Allahabad High Court refused to interfere with the impugned show cause notice and dismissed the writ petition but the Court granted liberty to the petitioner to submit an additional reply within two weeks in view of the corrigendum notice dated 4 May 2026. It directed the concerned authority to consider all replies filed by the assessee and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law.
About Author

Saima
Content Writer
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
191My Recent Articles
- AAAR Rules GST Advance Ruling Cannot Be Used to Determine Taxability of Completed Transactions Requiring Fact-Finding Premium
- Rajasthan Commercial Taxes Department Issues New Guidelines for GST Return Scrutiny Under Section 61 of RGST Act, 2017
- ITAT Rules Mutuality Based Club's Liquor Supply to Members Cannot Automatically Trigger Tax Audit PenaltyPremium
- ITAT Rules CIT(E) Cannot Reject Section 12AB And 80G Applications Without Granting Reasonable Opportunity of Being HeardPremium
- ITAT Remands Reassessment Validity Issue to CIT(A) for Fresh Adjudication After Finance Act 2026 DevelopmentsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








