Allahabad High Court Quashes Tax Orders Over Violation of Natural Justice Principles:

The Allahabad High Court quashed tax orders on the ground of violation of natural justice for lack of a proper hearing and directed fresh adjudication in accordance with due process.
Fair Hearing is Mandatory in Judicial Matters

Allahabad High Court Quashes Tax Orders Over Violation of Natural Justice Principles
The Allahabad High Court held that a tax order cannot be considered valid if the taxpayer has not been granted a proper opportunity of hearing, as this practice is an explicit violation of the principles of natural justice.
Pramod Kumar Chaurasiya had filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court, challenging two orders dated November 10, 2025, and August 24, 2024, passed by the State Tax Officer, Khand-1, Balrampur. The petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
The High Court heard the case and noted that the petitioner was not given a proper opportunity to be heard before the impugned orders were passed. Additionally, no further notice was issued addressing the petitioner.
The court considered this a clear contravention of the principles of natural justice and hence quashed the impugned orders dated November 10, 2025, and August 24, 2024. Remand the case back to the tax authorities for fresh adjudication of the case with directions to issue a fresh show-cause notice (SCN) to the petitioner. After receiving the notice, the petitioner has been asked to file a detailed reply within two weeks of the date of receipt.
Once the petitioner furnishes the reply, the tax authorities must issue another notice scheduling the date of a personal hearing. Once the hearing is properly conducted, the tax authorities must issue a final order with reasonable directions considering the same. With these directions, the high court closed the case.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2587My Recent Articles
- Rs 1.48 Crore Interest on Delayed Property Payments Qualifies as Cost of Acquisition: ITAT DelhiPremium
- ROC Penalises Company and Director Rs 20,000 for Wrong AGM Date in Form AOC-4CFSPremium
- ROC Penalises Company's Eight Directors Over Non-Appointment of Two Independent Directors for FY 2015-16 to 2018-19Premium
- An Inadvertent Typographical Error in Tax Audit Report Should Not Lead to An Unmerited Disallowance, Rules ITATPremium
- 21 CBI Officials Honoured With President’s Medals for Distinguished and Meritorious Service on 80th Independence Day
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts







