AO cannot sit on chair of businessman to replace his business strategy by his own whims and fancies: ITAT:

AO cannot sit on chair of businessman to replace his business strategy by his own whims and fancies: ITAT The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in…
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Decision

AO cannot sit on chair of businessman to replace his business strategy by his own whims and fancies: ITAT
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in the matter of ACIT vs Ashish Bansal has reiterated that it is a well-accepted principle tax jurisprudence that the Assessing Officer cannot sit on the arm chair of a businessman assessee to replace his business strategy by his own whims and fancies.
When the assessee took decision to reduce GP rate with an intention to fetch high turnover resulting into increase in the total net profit and under this strategy the assessee under took turnover of 34 times in comparison to the immediately preceding year taking sky high increase in the turnover which resulted into reduction of GP rate to 0.41%. From the copy of the three years comparative chart with breakup of jewellery segment, bullion segment and Job work segment it is clear that when the turnover of assessee was less than the GP rate was 8.59% and when the assessee under business strategy increase the turnover to 34 times to Rs 292.13 crore then the GP rate was reduce to 0.41% the GP rate of other segments such as artificial jewellery, semi precious stones and job work also faced marginal changes but the Assessing Officer only noted abnormal fall in GP rate of jewellery without pointing out any defects or discrepancies in the audited books of accounts of assessee and this approach without any other positive material or evidence, only on standalone basis is not correct and justified.
In view of the foregoing, ITAT held that the ld. CIT(A) was right in deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer without any justified reasoning and cogent basis. Thus, ITAT declined to interfere with the findings arrived by ld. first appellate authority as they were unable to seen any ambiguity, perversity or any valid reason to interfere with the findings of the ld. CIT(A).
Accordingly, grounds of revenue being devoid of merits were dismissed.
About Author

CA Pratibha Goyal
Co Founder
CA Pratibha Goyal is Chartered Accountant qualified in 2016, is a Member of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India having wide experience in the field of Auditing, Taxation, ROC, GST and Secretarial matters etc.
She has written over a thousand articles & has made several videos on topics related to Auditing & Taxation. As a Speaker she has delivered various sessions on various branches of NIRC of ICAI.
CA Pratibha Goyal is Chartered Accountant qualified in 2016, is a Member of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India having wide experience in the field of Auditing, Taxation, ROC, GST and Secretarial matters etc.
She has written over a thousand articles & has made several videos on topics related to Auditing & Taxation. As a Speaker she has delivered various sessions on various branches of NIRC of ICAI.
Studycafe
New Delhi, Delhi, India
1486My Recent Articles
- Biggest Labour Reform in Indian History: 4 Labour Codes Effective from today
- Tax Audit and ITR Due date not extended in this case: Know More
- Government notifies Agreement and Protocol between India and Qatar [Read Notification]
- CA Breaking: Results of ICAI Examination to be announced soon, Know probable Date
- Breaking: GSTR-3B Due Date for September 2025 extended by CBIC amid Diwali Festivities
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








