Bogus Purchases: ITAT Restricts Addition to 5% Following Consistency Principle:

Cross appeals on estimation of profit from alleged bogus purchases – consistency with earlier years upheld
ITAT Mumbai: Bogus Purchase Addition Restricted to 5% Following Past Years

Bogus Purchases: ITAT Restricts Addition to 5% Following Consistency Principle
The assessee, an individual engaged in business, filed his return for AY 2010–11 declaring income of Rs. 1,11,68,137. The assessment was reopened under section 147 on the basis of information from the Investigation Wing, Mumbai, relying on data from the Sales Tax Department, Maharashtra, alleging that certain suppliers were issuing accommodation purchase bills without actual delivery of goods.
The Assessing Officer treated purchases aggregating to Rs. 5,68,98,134 from 26 parties as non-genuine and, while accepting corresponding sales, estimated profit at 25% of such purchases. On appeal, the CIT(A) upheld rejection of books under section 145(3) but reduced the profit rate to 12.5%. Both the assessee and the Revenue filed cross appeals before the Tribunal.
Question of Law: What should be the appropriate percentage of profit to be estimated and added to income in respect of alleged bogus purchases where sales are accepted and quantitative records are maintained?
ITAT's Decision: The ITAT held that since sales were not disputed, quantitative stock records were maintained, and payments were made through banking channels, the entire purchase amount could not be disallowed. Only the profit element embedded in such purchases could be brought to tax.
Following the Tribunal’s own decisions in the assessee’s case for AYs 2011-12 and 2012-13, involving identical facts and the same parties, the ITAT applied the principle of consistency and restricted the addition to 5% of the alleged bogus purchases. Therefore, the Revenue’s appeal was dismissed and the assessee’s appeal was partly allowed.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2166My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condones 648-Day Delay After Assessee Lost Family During COVID, Restores AppealPremium
- ITAT Quashes Rs 2 Crore Penalty as Time-Barred; Limitation Starts from AO’s Reference, Not Show-Cause NoticePremium
- ITAT Remands Appeal After Finding NFAC Ignored 89 Pages of Evidence on Cash Deposits and Flat Improvement CostPremium
- ITAT Grants Fresh Opportunity in Rs 2.63 Crore Foreign Bank Credit Addition CasePremium
- ITAT Deletes Section 68 Addition on Explained Demonetisation Cash DepositsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








