Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Faces Rs 574 Crore Tax Adjustment, Plans Legal Challenge:

Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Company Limited received an Income Tax assessment order raising its taxable income to Rs 574.35 crore, which it plans to challenge while exploring legal remedies.
Income Tax Dept Revises Bombay Dyeing’s Income to Rs 574 Crore

Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Faces Rs 574 Crore Tax Adjustment, Plans Legal Challenge
The Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Company Limited, a Non-Resident of India (NRI), has informed the stock exchange (NSE and BSE) that it has received an Assessment Order passed by the Assessment Unit of the Income Tax Department under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
According to the disclosure, the order was received by the company on Monday (May 04, 2026), through email, for the assessment year 2023-24. The order has made additions to the company's income on grounds of transfer pricing adjustments, disallowance of deductions claimed with respect to real estate income offered in the earlier years, and certain other expenses. This resulted in the total taxable income of Rs 574.35 crore.
This increased income was set off against available tax losses. Thereafter, the tax authorities issued a notice to the company, raising the income tax demand amounting to Rs 2.26 lakh. Separately, initiated penalty proceedings against the company. The company has clarified that it believes that the order is not valid. Consequently, planning to take relevant actions against the order and, additionally, looking for all possible legal remedies available under the Income Tax Act.
The aforementioned disclosure has been made by Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Company Limited through an intimation dated May 04, 2026, addressed to the Bombay Stock Exchange Limited (BSE) and National Stock Exchange of India Limited (NSE).
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2464My Recent Articles
- ITAT Deletes Rs 3.05 Lakh On-Money Addition, Accepts Family Cash Savings and Joint Ownership ExplanationPremium
- ITAT Grants Second Opportunity, Restores Six Appeals After Rs 50,000 Cost for Non-Appearance Before Tax AuthoritiesPremium
- A Taxpayer Must Be Granted a Minimum 7-Day Time Limit to Respond to a Section 148A(b) Notice, Holds ITAT Premium
- Income Tax Dept Introduces Additional Field To Disclose Secondary Address in All ITR Forms for AY 2026-27
- ITAT Strikes Down Entire Reassessment Proceedings Over Unsigned Section 148 NoticePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








