Bombay High Court Sets Aside Rs 8,414 Crore Demand Against Bharti Airtel Limited:

The Bombay High Court has set aside a demand of Rs 8,414 Crore and allowed the writ petition filed by Bharti Airtel Limited.
HC Allows Writ Petition Filed by Bharti Airtel Limited

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Rs 8,414 Crore Demand Against Bharti Airtel Limited
Bharti Airtel Limited had filed a writ petition in the Honourable Bombay High Court, contesting a notice dated January 8, 2013, raising a demand amounting to Rs 5,201.2 Crore on the company, which was later revised to Rs 8,414 Crore.
The notice was issued by the Department of Telecommunications regarding the one-time spectrum charge (OTSC). The demand of Rs 473.7 crore was included in this, which belonged to the Company’s subsidiary named Bharti Hexacom Limited, concerning its two telecom circles, Rajasthan and NESA.
The company had informed the stock exchange about the aforementioned information through an earlier Intimation dated August 14, 2023, in pursuance of Regulation 30 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (‘SEBI Listing Regulations’).
Now, through another Intimation dated June 09, 2026, the company is disclosing to the National Stock Exchange of India Limited (NSE) and Bombay Stock Exchange Limited (BSE), that the Bombay High Court has set aside the impugned demand notice and allowed the writ petition filed by it through a Judgement dated June 8, 2026.
The court had uploaded its judgement delivered in the present case on its official website on June 08, 2026.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2701My Recent Articles
- ITAT Rejects Section 69A Unexplained Money Addition Based on Alleged Over-Invoicing Entry Found in Third-Party SearchPremium
- ITAT Condoned 336-Day Delay in Section 68 Case After Taxpayer Cites Lack Of Online Communication AwarenessPremium
- United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax Dispute
- Aries Agro Faces Rs 3.96 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Availment from Retrospectively Cancelled Vendors
- ITAT Restores Appeal Over Rs 9.33 Crore Section 68 Share Application Addition After DTVSV Payment FailurePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts








