SEBI Proposes to Cancel 5paisa's Registration as Investment Adviser Over Non-Payment of Prescribed Fees:

5paisa receives an SCN from SEBI, proposing to cancel its registration as an investment adviser for not paying the prescribed fees under the SEBI (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013.
Company Being Asked to Show Cause Reason Why Its Registration Should Not Be Cancelled

SEBI Proposes to Cancel 5paisa's Registration as Investment Adviser Over Non-Payment of Prescribed Fees
5paisa, in a recent intimation dated June 06, 2026, addressed to the Bombay Stock Exchange Limited (BSE) and the National Stock Exchange of India Limited (NSE), has disclosed that it has received a Show Cause Notice (SCN) issued by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI).
The notice has proposed to cancel the company's certificate of registration as an investment adviser under Regulation 30A of the SEBI (Intermediaries) Regulations, 2008, read with Section 12(3) of the SEBI Act, 1992. The company is being asked to specify the reason why the specified action should not be taken against it.
The company had received the said SCN through post on June 05, 2026. As per the provisions of Clause 3 of the Second Schedule of the SEBI (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013, every investment advisor holding a certificate of registration is required to pay the prescribed fees every five years from the date of issuance of the certificate, within 3 months before the expiry period for which the fees have been paid. This is done to ensure registration remains in force.
In this context, the statutory regulatory authority has alleged the company for not paying the prescribed fees despite holding a certificate of registration, which is an explicit violation of Regulation 13(a) read with Clause 3 of the Second Schedule of the SEBI (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013; hence, in consequence, the company's registration as an investment adviser has expired.
Now, the SEBI has proposed to further cancel the company's registration as an investment adviser, which has already expired for not paying the prescribed fees. The company has been asked to show cause for the reason why its registration should not be cancelled.
The company has disclosed the aforementioned information in pursuance of Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, read with SEBI Circular No. SEBI/HO/CFD/PoD2/CIR/P/0155 dated November 11, 2024.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2460My Recent Articles
- ITAT Strikes Down Entire Reassessment Proceedings Over Unsigned Section 148 NoticePremium
- ITAT Deletes Section 271B Penalty, Holds Form 3CD Reporting Error Covered Under Reasonable CausePremium
- A Taxpayer Cannot Be Forced to Pay GST Twice Merely Because Tax Paid Under Wrong Head, Rules High CourtPremium
- ITAT Restores Appeal After Condoning 1,929-Day Delay Caused by Director’s Jail Term and IllnessPremium
- Partial Tax Refund Must Be Adjusted Against Interest First, ITAT Upholds Section 244A Refund Interest ComputationPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








