Cash Deposits Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Income Merely for Accepting Old Currency, Rules ITAT:

Cash Deposits Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Income Merely for Accepting Old Currency, Rules ITAT

The ITAT held that cash deposits made from genuine business sales during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained income under Section 69A merely because they involved old currency notes.

Acceptance of SBNs May Violate Rules, But Not Trigger Section 69A

authorSaloni KumaridateMay 23, 2026
Last update on May 23, 2026
Cash Deposits Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Income Merely for Accepting Old Currency, Rules ITAT The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Ahmedabad held in favour of the taxpayer company in a case concerning cash deposits made during the demonetisation period of 2016. The assessee, M/s Krishna Petroleum, had declared a total income of about Rs 3 lakh during the assessment year 2017-18. During return processing, the tax authorities made an addition to the assessee's income on the grounds that the assessee had made cash deposits of Specified Bank Notes (SBN) amounting to Rs 63.96 lakh during the period of demonetisation, treating the same as unexplained money under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act. The addition amount was equal to the cash deposited, i.e., Rs 63.96 lakh.
GST Refunds Not Taxable Under Exclusive Accounting Method: ITAT Quashes Rs 223.40 Crore Tax Demand
The tax department claimed that the assessee, being a private petrol pump dealer, was not authorised to accept Specified Bank Notes (SBNs) after demonetisation. When approached, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] sustained the impugned addition. Thereafter, when the assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT Ahmedabad, the tribunal observed that the tax authorities had never contested that the cash deposits were linked to the assessee’s regular business sales. The only objection raised was that the sales were made against old currency notes, which the assessee was allegedly not permitted to accept. Consequently, the tribunal held that even if accepting SBNs was considered unauthorised, it would only attract consequences under the relevant law governing demonetisation rules and not under the Income Tax Act.
GST: Calcutta High Court Rules Polypropylene Leno Bags Are Plastic, Not Textile Products
Further held that once the source of cash deposits was explicitly identifiable as business sales, the amount could not be treated as unexplained income under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act merely because the transactions involved old currency notes. Accordingly, the ITAT deleted the entire impugned addition of Rs 63.96 lakh and allowed the assessee's appeal.

About Author

Saloni Kumari

Content Writer

Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2389
Up Next

Loading suggestions…