Judgement

The Tribunal carefully analysed the submissions and observed that the assessee had submitted all the required documents to prove that the property was bought by her husband.

No Income Tax Addition for Unexplained Investment on Wife When Husband Funded Property Purchase: ITAT

News

A user (VSV Dairies) criticized ICAI for holding too many exams and urged it to focus on quality over quantity.

CA Criticizes ICAI’s Exam Reforms, Calls for Quality Over Quantity

SC reinstates criminal proceedings against MLA Rajendra Singh and others for allegedly forging caste certificate to contest an SC-reserved seat; directs trial within one year.

SC Restores Criminal Trial Over Fake Caste Certificate Election Fraud to Face Full Judicial Scrutiny

Big Relief for Businesses! ITC Can’t Be Denied Just Because Supplier’s GST Registration Was Cancelled Later, Allahabad High Court Rules in Favour of Traders

ITC Cannot Be Denied If Supplier’s GST Registration Was Cancelled Later: Allahabad High Court

ITAT Mumbai upheld the investor’s Rs. 8.79 crore capital gain as genuine, rejecting the Revenue’s penny stock allegation for lack of evidence.

ITAT Mumbai Upholds Rs. 8.79 Crore Share Gain as Genuine, Rejects Bogus Penny Stock Allegation

The court observed that neither the revenue nor the Appellate Authority have mentioned any findings against the petitioner, which shows that the petitioner has claimed ITC by reason of fraud, misstatement, or suppression of fact.

Explore Our Blogs

Stay updated with the latest insights, tips, and industry trends from our experts

No Income Tax Addition for Unexplained Investment on Wife When Husband Funded Property Purchase: ITAT

CA Criticizes ICAI’s Exam Reforms, Calls for Quality Over Quantity

SC Restores Criminal Trial Over Fake Caste Certificate Election Fraud to Face Full Judicial Scrutiny

ITC Cannot Be Denied If Supplier’s GST Registration Was Cancelled Later: Allahabad High Court

ITAT Mumbai Upholds Rs. 8.79 Crore Share Gain as Genuine, Rejects Bogus Penny Stock Allegation

GST: Clear Evidence of Fraud Required for Section 74 Action