ITAT Mumbai: MSMED Interest Reversal Cannot Be Added If No Deduction Was Claimed:

ITAT Mumbai: MSMED Interest Reversal Cannot Be Added If No Deduction Was Claimed

ITAT holds that reversal of MSMED interest provision cannot be added back where the assessee never claimed it as a deduction; matter remanded for verification.

ITAT Mumbai: MSMED Interest Reversal Not Taxable If No Deduction Claimed

authorMeetu KumaridateJan 10, 2026
Last update on Jan 10, 2026
ITAT Mumbai: MSMED Interest Reversal Cannot Be Added If No Deduction Was Claimed The assessee, Siemens Limited, filed its return of income for AY 2020-21. While processing the return under Section 143(1), the CPC made an upward adjustment of Rs. 6,62,28,591, representing the reversal of interest provided under Section 23 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006. The assessee contended that although a provision for such interest was created in the books in view of statutory requirements, the same was never claimed as a deduction while computing taxable income and was later reversed when suppliers did not claim interest. The first appellate authority, however, upheld the adjustment, holding that MSMED interest is not allowable as a deduction.
ITAT Quashes 37% Surcharge on Employee Welfare Trust; Normal AOP Rates to Apply
Issue Raised: Whether the reversal of interest provided under Section 23 of the MSMED Act can be added to income where such interest was never claimed as a deduction by the assessee. Tribunal Held: The ITAT Mumbai held that if the assessee had merely created a provision for MSMED interest but had not claimed it as a deduction while computing income, there could be no occasion to make an addition on reversal of such provision.
Non-filing of ITR by suppliers does not render purchases bogus: ITAT
The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to factually verify the assessee’s claim and delete the addition if it is found that no deduction was claimed and the amount was subsequently reversed. The issue was remanded with a direction to grant a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157
Up Next

Loading suggestions…