News

GST officials raided Jalandhar’s Aggarwal Vaishno Dhaba and the owners’ homes over suspected GST theft.

Central GST Team Raids Jalandhar’s Aggarwal Vaishno Dhaba Over Suspected GST Theft

Judgement

Delhi High Court allows a company to appeal a CGST demand without fresh pre-deposit after finding overlapping GST proceedings by DGST and CGST.

Delhi High Court: No Double Pre-Deposit for Same GST Demand; Appeal Allowed Till Jan 2026

Articles

As per the SIB Assistant Commissioner Shivkumar Singh, the preliminary scrutiny suggested that Maha Lakshmi Steel fraudulently claimed ITC using fake invoices without any actual purchases of goods or services.

GST Dept Uncovers Bogus ITC Worth Rs 50 Lakh During Raid on Maha Lakshmi Steel

It was claimed that the 180-day rule violates Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. The petitioner argued that the provisos result in cascading effects and go against the GST's aim of promoting seamless credit flow.

Gujarat High Court Examines GST ITC Reversal Within 180 Days Rule

Court balances attorney-client privilege with investigative needs; directs controlled forensic parsing of data related to Martkarma Technologies

High Court Allows Further Parsing of Seized Advocate’s CPU by Forensic Lab Amid GST Investigation

Delhi High Court Allows inspection of Seized Advocate’s CPU Amid GST Investigation

Tribunal holds that an unsigned appellate order cannot render a pending appeal infructuous; directs de-novo adjudication with full opportunity

Explore Our Blogs

Stay updated with the latest insights, tips, and industry trends from our experts

Central GST Team Raids Jalandhar’s Aggarwal Vaishno Dhaba Over Suspected GST Theft

Delhi High Court: No Double Pre-Deposit for Same GST Demand; Appeal Allowed Till Jan 2026

GST Dept Uncovers Bogus ITC Worth Rs 50 Lakh During Raid on Maha Lakshmi Steel

Gujarat High Court Examines GST ITC Reversal Within 180 Days Rule

Delhi High Court Allows inspection of Seized Advocate’s CPU Amid GST Investigation

ITAT Remands Appeal After Faceless CIT(A) Dismissed It as “Duplicate” Based on Unsigned Earlier Order