Judgement

Legitimate carry forward of ITC cannot be denied for non-filing of TRAN-1

Whether amount forfeited on account of breach of sale of land agreement taxable under GST

Petitioner challenging action under section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017 directed to furnish security in the form of bank guarantee in terms of Section 67 (6) of the Act and Rule 140 of the Rules for release of the seized goods in terms of the interim relief granted to the Petitioner

Petitioner challenging action under section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017 directed to furnish bank guarantee

Rule 86A provides for Interim restriction of attachment, bi-parte hearing order should be passed to make it permanent

HC allows refund under Inverted Duty Structure in case of input and output supplies being same

Writ Petitions having alternative remedy not to be entertained if no violation of fundamental rights, excess jurisdiction/ delegation

Explore Our Blogs

Stay updated with the latest insights, tips, and industry trends from our experts

Legitimate carry forward of ITC cannot be denied for non-filing of TRAN-1

Whether amount forfeited on account of breach of sale of land agreement taxable under GST

Petitioner challenging action under section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017 directed to furnish bank guarantee

Rule 86A provides for Interim restriction of attachment, bi-parte hearing order should be passed to make it permanent

HC allows refund under Inverted Duty Structure in case of input and output supplies being same

Writ Petitions having alternative remedy not to be entertained if no violation of fundamental rights