Judgement

CESTAT Ahmedabad Bench has decided in favour of cricketer Ajitesh Argal, a former under-19 Indian Team player, that he is not required to pay service tax on brand marketing fees received from Nike India during the IPL.

Kings XI Punjab Ex-Player Ajitesh Argal not liable to Pay Service Tax for Nike India Brand Promotion Payments during IPL: CESTAT

Kings XI Punjab Ex-Player Ajitesh Argal not liable to Service Tax for Nike India Brand Promotion Payments during IPL: CESTAT

In absence of convincing material that supply has actually taken place; ITC cannot be claimed only on basis of invoice: SC

News

State finance minister has extended Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) government's amnesty scheme for settling tax, interest, penalty, or late fee arrears prior to the implementation of the Goods and Services Tax.

Extension of Amnesty Scheme for Pre-GST Tax Arrears

A remission on tax arrears, interest, penalty, or late fees under the West Bengal Sales Tax (Settlement of Dispute) Act, 1999, was declared in the West Bengal Finance Bill, which was submitted in the state legislature on Monday.

West Bengal to waive 25000 outstanding Sales Tax Matters

HC quashes attachments order passed without application of mind made on properties belonging to Directors

The High Court stated, the charger sold as part of a mobile phone set is subject to 5% tax under the Karnataka Value Added Tax (KVAT) Act.

Explore Our Blogs

Stay updated with the latest insights, tips, and industry trends from our experts

Kings XI Punjab Ex-Player Ajitesh Argal not liable to Service Tax for Nike India Brand Promotion Payments during IPL: CESTAT

In absence of convincing material that supply has actually taken place; ITC cannot be claimed only on basis of invoice: SC

Extension of Amnesty Scheme for Pre-GST Tax Arrears

West Bengal to waive 25000 outstanding Sales Tax Matters

HC quashes attachments order passed without application of mind made on properties belonging to Directors

Charger sold along with mobile phone in a set won’t draw separate higher VAT: Karnataka HC