CBIC Issues Clarification on Review and Appeal Authority in DGGI-Handled GST Cases:

CBIC issues a clarifying circular on review, revision, and appeals in GST cases handled by DGGI and Common Adjudicating Authorities.
New CBIC Guidelines on DGGI GST Case Handling

CBIC Issues Clarification on Review and Appeal Authority in DGGI-Handled GST Cases
The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has issued a new GST circular [No. 250/07/2025-GST] dated June 24, 2025, to bring clarity to an important issue regarding cases managed by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI). These cases violate serious GST rules, and their final decisions are taken by special officers known as Common Adjudicating Authorities (CAAs). Roles of CAAs were previously defined in Notification No. 02/2017-Central Tax dated June 19, 2017, and Circular No. 239/33/2024-GST.
Previously, the central government issued a circular outlining how these authorities are appointed and which areas come under these authorities. However, the circular did not clearly mention who will review the orders passed by CAAs, who will handle appeals if someone challenges these orders, and who can revise these orders if needed. This created confusion among officers and taxpayers. The newly released circular mentions all this missing information.
The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) consulted the Ministry of Law and Justice, and on the basis of legal advice and GST laws (mainly Sections 107 and 108 of the CGST Act, 2017), the circular now clearly mentions who does what.
Here are the key clarifications:
1. Review of Orders (Section 107)
- The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Central Tax, under whom the CAA works, will now be the authority to review any order issued by the Common Adjudicating Authority (CAA). This review assists in verifying whether the decision taken is as per legal rules or needs to be challenged by the department.
- The same Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Central Tax, under whom the CAA works, will also act as the revisional authority. Meaning, they have the authority to update the order if they discover legal mistakes or irregularities in it. This specification is in support of the previous notification (No. 05/2020), which already gave these officers the authority to update orders passed by their subordinate officers.
- If, in case, taxpayers or the department want to challenge the decision of CAA, then that raised appeal will be listed by the Commissioner (Appeals) of the area where the CAA is posted.
- This is to make sure that the appeal is being handled by someone Commissioner (Appeals) of the area where the CAA is posted.
- If, in case the department itself wants to file an appeal or respond to the appeal of the taxpayer, the responsibility lies with the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Central Tax, under whom the CAA works. A junior officer can also be appointed by the commissioner to represent the department in court.
- The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Central Tax, under whom the CAA works, is also permitted to ask DGGI (who originally investigated and issued the notice) for comments or input before reviewing or updating an order. This is to understand the background of the case properly.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2485My Recent Articles
- Trust’s Sections 12AB and 80G Registration Cannot Be Denied Before Charitable Project Is Completed, Holds ITATPremium
- ITAT Says Identity and Creditworthiness Irrelevant Where Loan Was Directly Paid to Haryana Mining DepartmentPremium
- Earlier Rejection Cannot Be Sole Ground to Reject Fresh Section 12AB and 80G Registration Applications, Says ITATPremium
- Cash Deposited During Demonetisation Cannot Be Taxed Under Section 69A if Linked to Business, Holds ITAT Premium
- ITAT Condones 1,731-Day Delay, Remands Cancer Trust's Section 12A Registration Application for Fresh ConsiderationPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…









