Coaching Institutes Not “Educational Institutions” for GST Exemption:

Coaching institutes cannot be treated as educational institutions; exemption under GST notification was denied by AAR.
Coaching Institutes Not Recognized As Educational Institutions Under GST Law

Coaching Institutes Not “Educational Institutions” for GST Exemption
The applicant, a proprietor running “Friends Classes” in Surat, was engaged in providing academic coaching to students of Standards 5 to 12 affiliated with GSEB and CBSE boards. The services involved supplementary education aimed at improving students’ academic performance through additional teaching, doubt-solving, and exam preparation.
The applicant sought an advance ruling on whether such coaching services qualify as exempt “education services” under Entry 66 of Notification No. 12/2017-CTR or are taxable as commercial coaching services. It was argued that education up to Class 12 is fundamental and that coaching institutes play a crucial role in supporting students’ learning.
Issue Before Court: Whether supplementary coaching services provided to school students qualify as exempt “education services” or are taxable under GST as commercial coaching services.
Tribunal Decided: The Authority for Advance Ruling held that the services provided by the applicant do not qualify for exemption under Entry 66 of Notification No. 12/2017. It was observed that such an exemption is limited to services provided by an “educational institution” as defined under the notification. The authority noted that the applicant was not imparting formal education as part of a recognised curriculum leading to a qualification but was instead providing supplementary coaching.
Such services merely support school education and do not fall within the scope of preschool, school education, or recognised vocational courses. Thus, the AAR classified the services under “commercial training and coaching services” (SAC 999293) under Notification No. 11/2017-CTR. The services were held liable to GST at 18% (9% CGST + 9% SGST).
To Read Full Order, Download PDF Given Below.
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2264My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condones 302-Day Delay, Restores Salary Assessment for Fresh VerificationPremium
- ITAT Condones Delay After Tax Consultant's Death, Restores Appeals for Fresh HearingPremium
- ITAT Remands Salary Addition, Says Taxability Depends on Salary Becoming Due, Not Mere ReceiptPremium
- ITAT Deletes TP Royalty Adjustment, Orders Fresh Review of Commission BenchmarkingPremium
- ITAT Quashes Reassessment Over Unsigned Section 148 Notice Issued to AssesseePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








