Commissioner (Appeals) Upholds Rs 3.75 Crore GST Demand Against ICICI Prudential Life; Further Challenge Planned:

ICICI Prudential Life’s appeal against a Rs 3.75 crore GST demand has been dismissed, with the company planning to further challenge the order.
ICICI Prudential Life’s Appeal Dismissed

ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company Limited has received an order passed by the Additional Commissioner (Mumbai Central) under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, sustaining a tax demand amounting to Rs 3.75 crore (including GST of Rs 1.87 crore and penalty of Rs 1.87 crore). The company had received the said order on September 09, 2026, at 12.08 pm IST.
Initially, the company had disclosed, vide an Intimation dated February 6, 2025, that it had received an order passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Division IX, CGST & CX, Mumbai Central, Maharashtra, under Section 74 of the GST Act, 2017.
Subsequently, the company filed an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), challenging the aforesaid order. In this context, the company has now received the present order dismissing its appeal and upholding the demand of Rs 3.75 crore, belonging to the period between July 2017 and September 2019.
The company has clarified that the present case does not have any expected impact on its financial, operational and business activities. The company is now planning to further challenge the order by filing an appeal before a relevant appellate authority.
ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company Limited has made the aforementioned disclosure via an Intimation dated September 10, 2026, addressed to the Bombay Stock Exchange Limited (BSE) and National Stock Exchange of India Limited (NSE) in pursuance of Regulation 30 and Regulation 51 read with Schedule III of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (SEBI Listing Regulations).
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2718My Recent Articles
- ITAT Deletes Section 56(2)(vii)(b) Addition on Property Purchase, Holds Property Price Difference Within 10% Tolerance LimitPremium
- ITAT Condones 1,008-Day Delay, Remands Unexplained Immovable Property Investment Case to CIT(A)Premium
- RTCA Urges Government to Extend Due Date for Filing Tax Audit Reports and Forms 10B/10BB for AY 2026-27 Until Oct 31
- ITAT Quashes Rs 1.30 Crore Section 68 Unexplained Credits Addition, Holds Investigation Wing Input Alone Cannot Justify ReassessmentPremium
- ITAT Remands Rs 1.18 Crore LIC Maturity Tax Dispute Over Alleged Double TaxationPremium
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Tags
Recent Posts
All Posts










