Delhi HC Sets Aside Ex-Parte GST Demand Where SCN Was Uploaded Only Under “Additional Notices” Tab:

Court grants fresh opportunity of hearing, remands matter subject to costs, and keeps validity of Section 168A notifications open pending SC decision
HC Quashes Ex-Parte GST Order Issued Without Proper SCN Service on Portal

Delhi HC Sets Aside Ex-Parte GST Demand Where SCN Was Uploaded Only Under “Additional Notices” Tab
The petitioner, Sight and Sound India Private Limited, challenged an ex-parte GST adjudication order passed for the tax period April 2018 to March 2019, raising a demand of Rs. 977,618. The petitioner contended that the show cause notice and the reminder were uploaded only under the “Additional Notices” tab on the GST portal and never came to its knowledge, resulting in the denial of the opportunity to reply or seek a personal hearing.
Thereafter, the assessment was completed ex parte. The petitioner also challenged Notification No. 09/2023–Central Tax and the corresponding State notification issued under Section 168A of the CGST Act.
Main Issue: Whether an ex-parte GST adjudication order can be sustained when the show cause notice was uploaded only under the “Additional Notices” tab of the GST portal, effectively denying the assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
HC Held: The High Court set aside the impugned adjudication order, holding that the petitioner had been denied a meaningful opportunity to respond. The Court observed that prior to 16.01.2024, notices uploaded under the “Additional Notices” tab frequently went unnoticed by taxpayers and that similar matters had been remanded.
The matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority with liberty to the petitioner to file a reply to the show cause notice, subject to payment of Rs. 10,000 to the Sales Tax Bar Association. The Court directed that notice of the personal hearing be communicated through email and mobile alerts and that a fresh reasoned order be passed.
The challenge to the validity of the notifications issued under Section 168A was kept open, with clarification that any fresh order would remain subject to the outcome of proceedings pending before the Supreme Court.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2166My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condones 648-Day Delay After Assessee Lost Family During COVID, Restores AppealPremium
- ITAT Quashes Rs 2 Crore Penalty as Time-Barred; Limitation Starts from AO’s Reference, Not Show-Cause NoticePremium
- ITAT Remands Appeal After Finding NFAC Ignored 89 Pages of Evidence on Cash Deposits and Flat Improvement CostPremium
- ITAT Grants Fresh Opportunity in Rs 2.63 Crore Foreign Bank Credit Addition CasePremium
- ITAT Deletes Section 68 Addition on Explained Demonetisation Cash DepositsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








