Farmer Declared Rs. 33.64 Lakh Agricultural Income; ITAT Treats Rs. 28.79 Lakh as Unexplained Income Due to Lack of Evidence:

The ITAT has granted partial relief to a taxpayer by restricting the addition of disputed agricultural income to Rs 28.79 lakh while recognising genuine agricultural activities.

ITAT Grants Partial Relief to Taxpayer in Unexplained Agricultural Income Case

Saloni Kumari

Jun 19, 2026

Last update on Jun 19, 2026

Farmer Declared Rs. 33.64 Lakh Agricultural Income; ITAT Treats Rs. 28.79 Lakh as Unexplained Income Due to Lack of Evidence The ITAT Hyderabad has provided partial relief to taxpayer Chinna Reddy Gillella by reducing an unexplained agricultural income addition made by the Tax Department in the Assessment Year 2018-19. The assessee (Chinna Reddy Gillella) had e-filed his income tax return (ITR) for the Assessment Year 2018-19, declaring an agricultural income of Rs 3.24 lakh. The assessee's case was selected for "limited scrutiny", and a notice dated September 28, 2019, was issued under Section 143(2) of the Act. During the assessment proceedings, the tax authorities had noted that the agricultural income declared by the assessee for the year under consideration was significantly higher in comparison to the last three preceding and succeeding years. Accordingly, the assessee was asked to explain the source of the agricultural income shown by him and also to submit relevant documentary evidence in support. When no submission was made from the assessee's side, the tax authorities treated the impugned agricultural income as unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act and assessed the total income at Rs 36.88 lakh. The aggrieved assessee filed an appeal before the lower appellate authority, i.e., Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]. However, the impugned addition was sustained, and the appeal was decided ex parte due to the assessee’s non-participation in the appellate proceedings. Thereafter, the assessee approached the ITAT Hyderabad and furnished land details, extracts of revenue records, particulars of agricultural activities, and bank records. It was also argued that agricultural income declared in earlier and subsequent years had been accepted by the department. The appeal before the tribunal was filed 84 days late; hence, the assessee had sought condonation of the delay, explaining that "the accountant who was looking after the income tax matters had failed to monitor the income tax portal and had not informed the assessee about the disposal of the appeal by the CIT(A)". The tribunal found the reason genuine; hence, the delay was condoned in the interest of justice. When the case was thoroughly analysed by the tribunal, it noted that the assessee had failed to adequately explain the unusually high agricultural income during the relevant year; the department could not ignore the fact that he owned agricultural land and had regularly disclosed agricultural income in other years. Accordingly, the ITAT estimated reasonable agricultural income at Rs 4.85 lakh and restricted the addition to Rs 28.79 lakh, thereby granting partial relief to the assessee.

About Author

Saloni Kumari

Content Writer

Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].