Forfeiture of Earnest Money/Security Deposits allowed as Deductible Income Tax Expense:

A luxury hotel operator tried to write off Rs. 4.90 crore in failed payments, including a deposit lost after a major fire and money gone from a failed business bid.
Incidental business expenses and loss of earnest money

Is it possible for the hotel to legitimately classify these losses as "bad debts" or business failures to reduce its tax liability?
Fact of the Case
The assessee, M/s Unison Hotels Pvt. Ltd., operates The Grand Hotel in New Delhi. In the 2014-15 assessment year, the company wrote off about Rs. 4.90 crore as 'advances written off.
This included Rs. 3.27 crore for a security deposit to M/s Gomti Food Spices for a failed restaurant project due to a fire, Rs. 1.50 crore loan to Mr. O.P. Parasrampuria in 1995-96 for discounted fabrics, and Rs. 11.06 lakhs for an unsuccessful joint venture to acquire cheaper natural gas for hotel operations.
Issue of this Case
Whether the advances written off are deductible as bad debts or business losses under Sections 36(1)(vii), 28, or 37(1) or if they are non-deductible as the assessee is not a money lender and the payments were capital or personal in nature?
Decision of the Tribunal
The ITAT partially approved the appeal, recognising the losses from the security deposit (Gomti Food Spices) and gas bid (Sankalp Oil) as deductible business losses related to hotel operations.
However, it upheld the rejection of the Rs. 1.50 crore advance to Mr. O.P. Parasrampuria, saying it as a personal loan due to the absence of documented business reciprocity over twenty years.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2701My Recent Articles
- ITAT Rejects Section 69A Unexplained Money Addition Based on Alleged Over-Invoicing Entry Found in Third-Party SearchPremium
- ITAT Condoned 336-Day Delay in Section 68 Case After Taxpayer Cites Lack Of Online Communication AwarenessPremium
- United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax Dispute
- Aries Agro Faces Rs 3.96 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Availment from Retrospectively Cancelled Vendors
- ITAT Restores Appeal Over Rs 9.33 Crore Section 68 Share Application Addition After DTVSV Payment FailurePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts









