GST Authorities Cannot Jump from Section 129 to Section 130 Without Completing Statutory Procedure: Gujarat HC:

GST Authorities Cannot Jump from Section 129 to Section 130 Without Completing Statutory Procedure: Gujarat HC

Gujarat HC Quashes GST Confiscation for Skipping Section 129 Procedure Confiscation notice quashed for abandoning detention proceedings mid-way Gujarat HC Quashes GST Confiscation for Skipping Section 129 Procedure

Confiscation notice quashed for abandoning detention proceedings mid-way

authorMeetu KumaridateFeb 9, 2026
Last update on Feb 9, 2026
GST Authorities Cannot Jump from Section 129 to Section 130 Without Completing Statutory Procedure: Gujarat HC Krishna Industries, engaged in the business of sale of metal scrap and duly registered under the GST law, was transporting goods from Ahmedabad to Sarkhej when its truck was intercepted by the State Tax Officer, Mobile Squad, Ahmedabad on 22.11.2023. Proceedings were initially initiated under Section 129 of the CGST Act for detention of goods and conveyance, including physical verification in Form GST MOV-04. However, during the pendency of the matter, the department issued a notice dated 02.12.2023 in Form GST MOV-10 under Section 130 of the Act, proposing confiscation of goods and conveyance. The petitioner challenged this action contending that the authorities had abandoned the proceedings under Section 129 and had impermissibly invoked Section 130 midway, contrary to settled law and earlier decisions of the Gujarat High Court.
Form-C Benefit Rejection Without Sharing Negative Report to Appellant Violates Natural Justice: Gujarat HC
Central Issue: Whether the GST authorities can directly invoke confiscation proceedings under Section 130 of the CGST Act after initiating detention proceedings under Section 129, without completing the statutory process and without establishing intent to evade tax.
HC Quashes Income Tax Reassessment for Alleged GST Component in Bogus Purchases
HC's Decision: The Hon'ble High Court held that the issue was squarely covered by its earlier decision dated 11.12.2025. The Court reiterated that Sections 129 and 130 operate in distinct fields and prescribe different consequences. While confiscation under Section 130 is permissible where there is a clear element of intention to evade tax, the authorities cannot abandon the procedure under Section 129 and straightaway resort to confiscation. In the present case, after intercepting the conveyance and initiating action under Section 129, the department directly issued a notice under Section 130 without completing the detention proceedings. Such action was found to be unsustainable in law. Thus, the impugned notice dated 02.12.2023 issued in Form GST MOV-10 and all consequential proceedings were quashed. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2165
Up Next

Loading suggestions…