GST Exemption Denied: AAR Declines Ruling on Manpower Services Due to Pending Appellate Proceedings:

The AAR refused to rule on the GST exemption query for manpower services, as the matter was already pending before the appellate authority under the CGST Act.
AAR Declines to Entertain GST Exemption Query

GST Exemption Denied: AAR Declines Ruling on Manpower Services Due to Pending Appellate Proceedings
The applicant, M/s Reliable Security and Intelligence Services (Orissa) Private Limited, has sought the Odisha Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) Goods and Services Tax (GST) by filing an application dated September 18, 2025, under Section 97 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of the CGST Rules, 2017 and Section 97 of the OGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of OGST Rules, 2017, in FORM GST ARA-01. The case was heard on November 25, 2025.
The applicant is registered under the GST Act, with GSTIN 21AABCR8198L1ZY and possesses a principal place of business at Room No. 105, Barabati Stadium, Buxi Bazar, Cuttack, Odisha-753001.
The applicant is engaged in supplying manpower services to distinct organisations, including the Government Polytechnic, Bhubaneswar, RWSS Division, Office/Sub-Division Office across Odisha under the Addl Secretary to Government & Administrative Officers and OWSM. In respect of the services supplied by the applicant, the present advance ruling has been sought.
The applicant asked the following question, seeking the Odisha AAR:
- "Question: Whether supply of manpower service to both Government Polytechnic, Bhubaneswar and RWSS Division, Office/Sub-Division Office across Odisha under Addl Secretary to Government & Administrative Officers, OWSM are exempted from GST as per Sl. No. 03 of Notification No. 12/2017 -СT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017."
- Ruling: The Odisha Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) Goods and Services Tax (GST) has denied giving any ruling on the present matter, holding that the questions raised by the applicant are already pending before the appellate authority under the CGST Act.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2421My Recent Articles
- ITAT Allows Section 115BAA Concessional Tax Benefit Despite Delayed Form 10-IC Filing Due to Technical IssuesPremium
- Bona Fide Mistake in ITR Cannot Deny Section 10(10B) Exemption on BSNL VRS Compensation, Holds ITATPremium
- ITAT Grants Taxpayer a Final Opportunity to Explain Rs 2.27 Crore Cash Deposits Under Section 69APremium
- ITAT Restores Appeals for Fresh Consideration After NFAC Denied Request of Personal Hearing Through Video ConferencingPremium
- ITAT Condones 97-Day Delay, Restores Appeal After CIT(A) Sent Hearing Notices to Wrong Email AddressPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…









