ITAT Holds Technical Delays Should Not Override Principles of Justice; Condones Form 10B Delay:

The ITAT condones the delay in filing Form 10B and restores the Sections 11 and 12 exemption claim, holding that technical delays should not override the principles of justice.
ITAT Restores Sections 11 and 12 Relief

ITAT Holds Technical Delays Should Not Override Principles of Justice; Condones Form 10B Delay
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad, restored exemption claims under Sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act, holding technical delays should not override the principles of justice.
The assessee had claimed exemption under Sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act. However, it had not furnished Form 10B within the statutory time limit. As a result, the tax authorities issued an intimation dated February 21, 2018, denying the aforementioned claimed exemptions. Later, the assessee furnished Form 10B in November 2023, along with an application seeking condonation of delay in filing Form 10B. However, the tax authorities rejected the request.
The assessee, being aggrieved with the tax authorities' order, approached the ITAT Ahmedabad, claiming the delay was procedural, not intentionall and should not restrict it from its rightful exemption, especially when it is pursuing remedies like rectification and condonation. The tribunal endorsed the arguments served by the assessee, holding that the delay was not deliberately made and that the assessee had been actively following up on its case.
The tribunal pointed out that technical delays should not override the principles of justice. Considering the same, the tribunal condoned the delay in filing Form 10B and instructed the tax authorities to consider the lately filed form as filed on time. In conclusion, the assessee's Sections 11 and 12 exemption claim was restored.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2701My Recent Articles
- ITAT Rejects Section 69A Unexplained Money Addition Based on Alleged Over-Invoicing Entry Found in Third-Party SearchPremium
- ITAT Condoned 336-Day Delay in Section 68 Case After Taxpayer Cites Lack Of Online Communication AwarenessPremium
- United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax Dispute
- Aries Agro Faces Rs 3.96 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Availment from Retrospectively Cancelled Vendors
- ITAT Restores Appeal Over Rs 9.33 Crore Section 68 Share Application Addition After DTVSV Payment FailurePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Tags
Recent Posts
All Posts








