HC Holds GST Registration Restoration Cannot Be Denied When Taxpayer Files Pending Returns and Clear Dues:

The Gauhati HC has directed GST authorities to consider restoration of GST registration of a proprietorship concern whose registration was cancelled for non-filing of returns.
High Court Directs Authorities to Restore GST Registration After Compliance

HC Holds GST Registration Restoration Cannot Be Denied When Taxpayer Files Pending Returns and Clear Dues
The Gauhati High Court ordered GST authorities to restore GST registration and held that where a taxpayer has already filed pending returns and is willing to pay outstanding tax, interest, late fee and penalty, the benefit of restoration cannot be denied.
The petitioner, Mr Tadar Akin, is engaged in business through his proprietorship concern under the name M/s Arunachal Offset Enterprise, registered under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The GST registration of the petitioner bearing GSTIN No. 12BPA7616K2ZB was cancelled by the tax authorities on the grounds of non-filing of GST returns for a continuous period of six months.
The petitioner argued that the non-filing happened because he was unaware of the show cause notice issued by the department, as he did not possess access to his GST portal login credentials. The petitioner further contended that all pending returns up to June 2021 had already been filed and is willing to pay the entire outstanding tax liability together with applicable interest, late fee and penalty.
The High Court referred to the Supreme Court decisions in Dug Rade v. Union of India and Yamang Siram v. Union of India. The court referred to the proviso to Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017, which provides that where a registered person furnishes all pending returns and pays the tax dues along with applicable interest and late fee, the proper officer may drop the cancellation proceedings and pass an order in Form GST REG-20.
Considering that the petitioner had already filed the pending returns and expressed readiness to pay all outstanding tax dues, interest, late fees and penalties, the Gauhati High Court respondent authorities shall verify the compliance made by the petitioner and consider restoration of the GST registration in accordance with law. Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed of with directions that the entire exercise be completed within four weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2458My Recent Articles
- A Taxpayer Cannot Be Forced to Pay GST Twice Merely Because Tax Paid Under Wrong Head, Rules High CourtPremium
- ITAT Restores Appeal After Condoning 1,929-Day Delay Caused by Director’s Jail Term and IllnessPremium
- Partial Tax Refund Must Be Adjusted Against Interest First, ITAT Upholds Section 244A Refund Interest ComputationPremium
- Farmer Receives Rs 72.76 Lakh GST Recovery Notice for Alleged Shell Company in Tamil Nadu
- ITAT Deletes Rs 2.42 Lakh Disallowance, Allows Depreciation on Capitalised Forex Loss Under Section 43APremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








