HC Sets Aside GST Penalty Order for Failure to Pass Reasoned Order After SCN:

The Punjab and Haryana High Court holds that payment of penalty does not dispense with the obligation to pass a speaking order and reiterates principles of natural justice.
HC Quashes GST Penalty Order for Not Passing Reasoned Order After SCN

HC Sets Aside GST Penalty Order for Failure to Pass Reasoned Order After SCN
The petitioner, Rajeev Kumar, engaged in the business of trading iron scrap under the firm M/s Sulodhia Steels, had his vehicle intercepted while transporting goods from Chennai to Mandi Gobindgarh. The vehicle was accompanied by an invoice, e-way bills, and transport documents. However, not being satisfied, the authorities initiated proceedings, conducted physical verification, and issued a detention order followed by a show cause notice proposing a tax and penalty of Rs. 358,614.
To secure the release of the goods and vehicle, the petitioner paid the demanded amount under protest. Despite submitting a reply to the show cause notice via email, the authority did not consider the reply and proceeded to pass a penalty order dated 28.01.2026 confirming the demand without issuing a reasoned order or adjudicating the reply.
Issue Before HC: Whether GST authorities are required to pass a reasoned adjudication order on a show cause notice even when the taxpayer has paid the tax and penalty amount.
HC Held: The High Court allowed the writ petition and set aside the penalty order dated 28.01.2026. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in M/s ASP Traders v. State of Uttar Pradesh, the Court held that payment of tax and penalty does not absolve the proper officer from the statutory obligation to pass a reasoned and speaking order.
The Court observed that the conclusion of proceedings under Section 129(5) of the CGST Act does not mean waiver of the taxpayer’s right to challenge the levy. A proper adjudication order is necessary to enable the taxpayer to avail themselves of the statutory remedy of appeal. Failure to pass such an order violates principles of natural justice and renders the demand unsustainable.
Therefore, the matter was remanded back to the authority with directions to pass a fresh reasoned order under Section 129(3) in Form GST MOV-09 after granting an opportunity of personal hearing and to upload the summary in Form GST DRC-07 within one month.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2220My Recent Articles
- ITAT: Carbon Credit Receipts Are Capital, Not Taxable Under Income TaxPremium
- Gujarat HC Quashes Section 148 Notice After Reassessment Proceedings Were DroppedPremium
- High Court Denies GST Refund After Delayed Tribunal Appeal Beyond Section 112 TimelinePremium
- ITAT Allows Section 10(10B) Exemption on BSNL VRS Compensation Despite Return OmissionPremium
- High Court Refuses Interference in Anti-Dumping Duty Matter Due to Alternative RemedyPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








