HC Sets Aside GST Registration Cancellation order for Lack of Proper Notice:

HC Sets Aside GST Registration Cancellation order for Lack of Proper Notice

High Court sets aside GST registration cancellation order for non-compliance with Rule 22 and improper show-cause notice.

High Court Holds GST Cancellation Invalid Due to Procedural Lapse in Notice

authorMeetu KumaridateJun 21, 2025
Last update on Jun 21, 2025
HC Sets Aside GST Registration Cancellation order for Lack of Proper Notice In a recent development, the petitioner contested the GST registration cancellation order dated June 21, 2023, issued by the Superintendent of the CGST Department. This cancellation was based on a show-cause notice dated June 15, 2023, which reportedly did not mention any specific reasons and also breached the mandatory 7-day reply period as per Rule 22 of the CGST Rules, 2017. The department had relied on a report by an enforcement officer stating that no business activity was found at the registered premises. However, the petitioner claimed that the show-cause notice was too vague and the cancellation order was passed too early.
No Hearing, No Justice! HC Strikes Down GST Order on Fake ITC under section 74
Issue Raised: Whether the GST registration cancellation order is still enforceable when the show-cause notice lacked specific grounds and an order was issued prior to the end of the statutory reply period.
GST Cancellation Not Final: High Court allows GSTN Revival on filing of outstanding Returns
HC’s Decision: The High Court, while allowing the petition, accepted the petitioner's contentions. It held that the show-cause notice did not satisfy the requirements of Rule 22 or the prescribed Form GST REG-17, as it lacked reasons, and the cancellation order was passed before the 7-day period expired. The Court observed that the notice denied the petitioner a fair chance to reply since it only referred to a general clause without mentioning any particular infraction of the GST Act or Rules. The Court emphasised that following procedural protections provided under Rule 22 is a mandatory requirement and not optional. The authorities must follow statutory compliances and principles of natural justice in all cases. The Court quashed the cancellation order and permitted the department to issue a fresh, properly reasoned notice if necessary. To Read Full Order, Download the PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157
Up Next

Loading suggestions…