ITAT: Marker Testing Receipts Taxable as Royalty; IT Support Reimbursements Not FTS under India-Netherlands DTAA:

ITAT rules that marker testing and double haploid service receipts of Nunhems Netherlands are taxable as royalty under India–Netherlands DTAA
ITAT Holds Marker Testing Fees as Royalty, IT Support Reimbursements Not FTS

ITAT: Marker Testing Receipts Taxable as Royalty; IT Support Reimbursements Not FTS under India-Netherlands DTAA
Nunhems Netherlands B.V., a company incorporated in the Netherlands, rendered marker testing services and double haploid (DH) services to its Indian group entity, Nunhems India Pvt. Ltd., to support vegetable breeding programmes. For A.Y. 2021-22, the assessee received Rs. 3.58 crore towards testing services and Rs. 10.66 crore towards reimbursement of IT support services. The assessee filed its return declaring NIL income, claiming both receipts as non-taxable under the India-Netherlands DTAA.
The Assessing Officer, by order passed under section 143(3) read with section 144C(13), treated the testing service receipts as royalty under Article 12(4) of the DTAA and the IT support receipts as fees for technical services (FTS) under section 9(1)(vii) and Article 12(5). The DRP, by majority, upheld both additions. Aggrieved, the assessee appealed before the ITAT.
Issues Before ITAT: Whether consideration received for marker testing and double haploid services constituted “royalty” under Article 12(4) of the India–Netherlands DTAA. Whether reimbursement of IT support service costs amounted to fees for technical services under section 9(1)(vii) of the Act and Article 12(5) of the DTAA.
ITAT's Verdict: The Tribunal held that the receipts from marker testing and double haploid services were taxable as royalty under Article 12(4) of the India–Netherlands DTAA, as they involved provision of information concerning scientific experience with clear commercial and industrial implications for the Indian AE. The Tribunal rejected the assessee’s contention that the “make available” condition was required for royalty under Article 12(4).
The Tribunal held that the amounts received were mere cost-to-cost reimbursements for routine IT support services procured through a third-party service provider, with no technology, skill, or know-how made available to the Indian AE. Therefore, the IT support receipts were held not taxable as FTS under the DTAA. The appeal was therefore partly allowed.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157My Recent Articles
- ITAT Restricts Addition to Commission on Accommodation Cash Deposit TransactionsPremium
- ITAT Grants Relief on BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ExemptionPremium
- ITAT Restores Charitable Trust's 12AB Registration Application After CIT(E) Rejects It for Non-Filing of DocumentsPremium
- Bombay High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Notice for AY 2015-16Premium
- ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition Accepting Deceased Father’s Lifetime Cash SavingsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








