ITAT: Marker Testing Receipts Taxable as Royalty; IT Support Reimbursements Not FTS under India-Netherlands DTAA:

ITAT: Marker Testing Receipts Taxable as Royalty; IT Support Reimbursements Not FTS under India-Netherlands DTAA

ITAT rules that marker testing and double haploid service receipts of Nunhems Netherlands are taxable as royalty under India–Netherlands DTAA

ITAT Holds Marker Testing Fees as Royalty, IT Support Reimbursements Not FTS

authorMeetu KumaridateDec 14, 2025
Last update on Dec 14, 2025
ITAT: Marker Testing Receipts Taxable as Royalty; IT Support Reimbursements Not FTS under India-Netherlands DTAA Nunhems Netherlands B.V., a company incorporated in the Netherlands, rendered marker testing services and double haploid (DH) services to its Indian group entity, Nunhems India Pvt. Ltd., to support vegetable breeding programmes. For A.Y. 2021-22, the assessee received Rs. 3.58 crore towards testing services and Rs. 10.66 crore towards reimbursement of IT support services. The assessee filed its return declaring NIL income, claiming both receipts as non-taxable under the India-Netherlands DTAA. The Assessing Officer, by order passed under section 143(3) read with section 144C(13), treated the testing service receipts as royalty under Article 12(4) of the DTAA and the IT support receipts as fees for technical services (FTS) under section 9(1)(vii) and Article 12(5). The DRP, by majority, upheld both additions. Aggrieved, the assessee appealed before the ITAT.
AAR Confirms Flipkart Road Logistics as GTA, Grants GST Exemption for Unregistered Buyers
Issues Before ITAT: Whether consideration received for marker testing and double haploid services constituted “royalty” under Article 12(4) of the India–Netherlands DTAA. Whether reimbursement of IT support service costs amounted to fees for technical services under section 9(1)(vii) of the Act and Article 12(5) of the DTAA.
High Court Declines Writ in Fake ITC Case, Directs Assessee to Statutory Appeal Route
ITAT's Verdict: The Tribunal held that the receipts from marker testing and double haploid services were taxable as royalty under Article 12(4) of the India–Netherlands DTAA, as they involved provision of information concerning scientific experience with clear commercial and industrial implications for the Indian AE. The Tribunal rejected the assessee’s contention that the “make available” condition was required for royalty under Article 12(4). The Tribunal held that the amounts received were mere cost-to-cost reimbursements for routine IT support services procured through a third-party service provider, with no technology, skill, or know-how made available to the Indian AE. Therefore, the IT support receipts were held not taxable as FTS under the DTAA. The appeal was therefore partly allowed. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157
Up Next

Loading suggestions…