GST Cancellation Not Final: High Court allows GSTN Revival on filing of outstanding Returns:

GST Cancellation Not Final: High Court allows GSTN Revival on filing of outstanding Returns

High Court cites sub-rule (4) of Rule 22 of the CGST Rules, 2017 as legal basis to revive registration in genuine cases

HC Rules: GST Cancellation Not Final Where Returns and Dues Are Cleared

authorMeetu KumaridateJun 20, 2025
Last update on Jun 20, 2025
GST Cancellation Not Final: High Court allows GSTN Revival on filing of outstanding Returns The petitioner’s GST registration was cancelled under Section 29(2)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017, due to non-filing of returns for over six months. A show cause notice had been issued in July 2021, but the petitioner failed to reply to it. He later explained the lapse by pointing to personal illness and disruptions caused by COVID-19. Having missed the statutory window for filing a revocation or appeal under the CGST framework, the petitioner directly approached the High Court seeking restoration of his cancelled GST registration to resume business operations.
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority Gets Income Tax Exemption Under Section 10(46)
Issue Raised: If the taxpayer later complies with return-filing and tax payment requirements, can the GST registration be reinstated after cancellation, even after the revocation period has passed?
Refunded Salary Still Taxed? High Court Slams Income Tax Dept in Major Judgment
HC's Decision: The High Court took up the matter and held that if the taxpayer agrees to regularise previous defaults, the GST registration cancellation is not final and absolute. According to Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules, if the assessee files all outstanding returns and pays all outstanding tax, interest, and late fees, the appropriate officer may end the cancellation process. The Court underlined that even in cases where the taxpayer did not initially reply to the show cause notice, the proviso to Rule 22(4) allows for such restoration. Recognizing the civil consequences of cancellation, such as loss of business opportunities and disqualification from tenders, the Court directed that upon full compliance by the petitioner, the authorities must consider restoration and issue an order in Form GST REG-20. The High Court confirmed that meeting tax obligations can take precedence over revocation timeline procedural errors. This ruling guarantees that legitimate taxpayers won't be excluded from a second opportunity based only on technicalities. To Read Order, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157
Up Next

Loading suggestions…