High Court Declines Intervention in Income Tax Recovery Amid Pending Tribunal Proceedings:

The Gauhati High Court refused to stop income tax recovery against the petitioner, noting the matter is already before the ITAT and should be decided there.
Rs 463 Crore Tax Recovery Challenge Dismissed

High Court Declines Intervention in Income Tax Recovery Amid Pending Tribunal Proceedings
The Gauhati High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by the Assam Co-operative Apex Bank Ltd, which had challenged income tax recovery orders demanding about Rs. 4,63,06,10,541 for the assessment year 2022-23.
The bank had also sought protection from coercive recovery steps, including possible attachment of its bank accounts.
The bank argued that it is a cooperative institution serving nearly 10 lakh depositors, mostly from economically weaker sections, and that freezing its accounts would severely affect public interest. It further submitted that its appeal is already pending before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal along with a stay application, and therefore, recovery action should be kept on hold.
It was also argued on behalf of the bank that the Tribunal is not sitting regularly, due to which it had approached the High Court seeking urgent relief. The bank contended that immediate recovery of such a huge demand, which is stated to be far higher than its net worth, would seriously impact its functioning and financial stability.
On the other hand, the Department argued that the High Court should not entertain the writ petition.
After hearing both sides, the High Court held that the petitioner had already approached the appropriate statutory forum, and therefore, there was no justification for invoking writ jurisdiction.
The Court stated that "the plea that the Tribunal is not sitting regularly cannot justify interference by this court in a matter that is sub judice before a competent statutory forum, particularly when the Tribunal is stated to be functional."
Finally, the Court dismissed the writ petition but directed that the ITAT should take up and decide the pending stay application expeditiously.
About Author
Vanshika verma
Content Writer
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Studycafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
1546My Recent Articles
- ITAT Quashes Reassessment Against Temple Society Over Missing Mandatory Section 143(2) Notice; Rs 97.50 Lakh Addition DeletedPremium
- CBDT Clarifies Repeal, Savings Provisions Under Income-tax Act, 2025
- India Orders Provisional Assessment of Chinese Insoluble Sulphur Imports Amid Anti-Absorption Review
- Government Notifies Customs Duty and IGST Exemption for Temporary Import of Animals under India–UK CETA
- Afcons Infrastructure Receives Rs 16.48 Crore Penalty Order, Plans to Challenge It
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








