High Court Sets Aside Lower TDS Certificate of MakeMyTrip, Orders Fresh AO Review:

High Court Sets Aside Lower TDS Certificate of MakeMyTrip, Orders Fresh AO Review

Court remands Section 197 certificate dispute, directing fresh reasoned order on withholding rate determination.

Court directs reassessment of withholding rate under Section 197 application

authorMeetu KumaridateMar 18, 2026
Last update on Mar 18, 2026

High Court Sets Aside Lower TDS Certificate of MakeMyTrip, Orders Fresh AO Review

The petitioner, MakeMyTrip India Private Limited, approached the Delhi High Court challenging an order and certificate issued under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act dated 17 July 2025 by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Gurugram for the financial year 2025–26. The company had applied for a lower TDS certificate, contending that the rate at which tax was being deducted did not reflect its actual tax liability. However, the Revenue issued the certificate at a rate which, according to the petitioner, was excessive and not properly justified.
ITAT Delhi Quashes Reassessment as Section 148 Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period
The core grievance of the petitioner was that while determining the withholding rate, the Assessing Officer had not adequately considered its financial position, past tax records, and relevant legal principles. It was argued that the order lacked proper reasoning and failed to address key aspects of the application, thereby resulting in an arbitrary determination of the TDS rate. This led the petitioner to seek judicial intervention for setting aside the certificate and directing a fresh consideration.

Central Issue: Whether the Section 197 certificate fixing the TDS rate was legally sustainable or required fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer.

ITAT Delhi Quashes Reassessment as Section 148 Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period
HC Decided: The High Court set aside the impugned order and certificate, observing that the matter required a more thorough and reasoned examination. The Bench, comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice V. Kameswar Rao and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar, noted that the issues raised by the petitioner were not adequately dealt with and that the determination of the withholding rate must be based on a proper evaluation of facts and applicable law. In the absence of such reasoning, the certificate could not be sustained.

Accordingly, the Court remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer with a direction to reconsider the application under Section 197 afresh and pass a clear, reasoned, and speaking order within two weeks. It was also clarified that the precedents relied upon by the Revenue on the principle of res judicata were not applicable in the present factual context, thereby reinforcing the need for an independent and proper determination.

To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

LinkedIn

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2200
Up Next

Loading suggestions…