ICAI Moves to Clarify Division of Audit Responsibility:

A year after dispute with NFRA, ICAI plans to propose a clearly defined audit responsibility between principal auditors and subsidiaries.
Know Why ICAI Wants Division of Audit Onus

ICAI Moves to Clarify Division of Audit Responsibility
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) now plans to clearly divide responsibilities between the principal auditor and the auditors of subsidiary companies. ICAI will also introduce a framework to fix accountability so that if something goes wrong, it will be clear who is responsible for the lapse.
The apex accountants' body is also planning to submit its recommendation to the corporate affairs ministry and the National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) for the revision of a standard that had led to its rift with the NFRA last year.
NFRA had suggested changing Audit Standard (SA) 600 so that it matches international practices. Under this proposal, the main auditor (principal auditor) of a company group will be fully responsible for the financial statements of the entire group, including all subsidiaries. The idea is to ensure better accountability, stronger audits, and fewer chances of mistakes or fraud in group companies.
ICAI had opposed the move because it felt that most of the audit work would go to a few large firms, while small and mid-sized chartered accountant firms would get very little work.
About Author
Vanshika verma
Content Writer
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Studycafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
1723My Recent Articles
- ITAT Quashes Reassessment as AO Makes No Addition on Reopening IssuePremium
- ITAT Sends Tax Addition Case Back to CIT(A) Over Inadequate Examination of EvidencePremium
- ITAT Quashes Rs 1.5 Lakh Penalty Under Section 271B, Cites Reasonable CausePremium
- Rs 33.73 Crore GST Fraud: Assam STF Nabs Alleged Mastermind in Kolkata
- ITAT Gives Taxpayer One More Opportunity to Present Evidence, Remands Ex-Parte Appeal to CIT(A)Premium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…







