Income Tax: Assessment under Section 153A Set Aside for Want of Search-Based Evidence

A search was conducted under Section 132 on 22.10.2016 in the assessee's cases. Under this, the Assessing Officer issued notices under Section 153A and completed assessments for A.Y. 2015-16, disallowing exemption claims under Section 54F totaling Rs. 69,47,34,829, on the ground that the property purchased was already in use by the assessees through company shareholding and LLP conversion.

The CIT(A) allowed the exemption claims on merits but did not adjudicate the assessee's additional ground that the assessments were invalid due to a lack of incriminating material. The Revenue appealed to the ITAT against the CIT(A)'s order, and the assessee invoked Rule 27 of the ITAT Rules to argue that the additions themselves were jurisdictionally flawed.

<div class="related-article-inline">Also Read<a href="/tds-on-fd-interest-avoid-unwanted-deduction-submit-form-15g-15h-know-process-375501.html" class="related-link">TDS on FD Interest: Avoid Unwanted Deduction: Submit Form 15G/15H; Know Process</a></div>

Central Issue: Whether the additions made under Section 54F during a completed assessment under Section 153A were valid without any incriminating material found during the search?

<div class="related-article-inline">Also Read<a href="/how-to-avoid-tds-on-interest-income-complete-guide-to-form-15g-15h-2025-384241.html" class="related-link">How to Avoid TDS on Interest Income: Complete Guide to Form 15G &amp; 15H [2025]</a></div>

ITAT Held: The ITAT held that the disallowances made under Section 54F were without jurisdiction as they were not based on any incriminating material found during the search. It observed that the seized documents and statements relied on by the AO did not pertain to the assessment year in question and did not establish any undisclosed income or irregularity in the exemption claim.
Relying on binding precedents, including Kabul Chawla and Abhisar Buildwell, the Tribunal concluded that completed/unabated assessments cannot be reopened under Section 153A in the absence of incriminating material. Consequently, it upheld the CIT(A)’s order on jurisdictional grounds and dismissed the Revenue’s appeals as invalid.
To Read Full Order, Download PDF Attached Below

Income Tax: Assessment under Section 153A Set Aside for Want of Search-Based Evidence

A search was conducted under Section 132 on 22.10.2016 in the assessee's cases. Under this, the Assessing Officer issued notices under Section 153A and completed assessments for A.Y. 2015-16, disallowing exemption claims under Section 54F totaling Rs. 69,47,34,829, on the ground that the property purchased was already in use by the assessees through company shareholding and LLP conversion.

The CIT(A) allowed the exemption claims on merits but did not adjudicate the assessee's additional ground that the assessments were invalid due to a lack of incriminating material. The Revenue appealed to the ITAT against the CIT(A)'s order, and the assessee invoked Rule 27 of the ITAT Rules to argue that the additions themselves were jurisdictionally flawed.

[related id="375501"]

Central Issue: Whether the additions made under Section 54F during a completed assessment under Section 153A were valid without any incriminating material found during the search?

[related id="384241"]

ITAT Held: The ITAT held that the disallowances made under Section 54F were without jurisdiction as they were not based on any incriminating material found during the search. It observed that the seized documents and statements relied on by the AO did not pertain to the assessment year in question and did not establish any undisclosed income or irregularity in the exemption claim.
Relying on binding precedents, including Kabul Chawla and Abhisar Buildwell, the Tribunal concluded that completed/unabated assessments cannot be reopened under Section 153A in the absence of incriminating material. Consequently, it upheld the CIT(A)’s order on jurisdictional grounds and dismissed the Revenue’s appeals as invalid.
To Read Full Order, Download PDF Attached Below

Tribunal quashes Rs. 69 crore capital gains disallowance; says AO lacked jurisdiction under Section 153A.

Income Tax: Assessment under Section 153A Set Aside for Want of Search-Based Evidence

ITAT Holds Resale Price Method as Most Appropriate for Benchmarking Import of Finished Goods Without Value Addition

In a significant ruling, the ITAT quashed an income tax assessment after holding that the order attained legal existence only upon being digitally signed.

ITAT Holds Assessment Order Is Legally Complete Only After Digital Signature; Time-Barred Order Quashed

HC Denies Anticipatory Bail to Material Supplier in Alleged Nal-Jal Yojana Fraud Over Missing GST Bills and Invoices

ITAT Rules No TDS on Commission Paid to Overseas Agent for Procuring Export Orders 

ITAT Deletes Penalty under Section 270A for Vague Show Cause Notice Lacking Specific Charge

Income Tax Dept Removes ‘Other Exempt Income’ Option from ITR Forms, Revises Schedule EI for AY 2026-27

Bombay High Court upholds negative crude oil futures settlement, refusing to rewrite completed derivative contracts.

HC Upholds MCX Circular Fixing Negative Due Date Rate for Crude Oil

Bombay High Court quashes penalty after time-barred Order Giving Effect caused assessment proceedings to abate completely.

HC Holds Time-Barred Assessment Cannot Sustain Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c)

ITAT rules revocable determinate securitisation trust qualifies for pass-through taxation, rejecting assessment as an AOP.

ITAT Upholds Pass-Through Taxation for Revocable Securitisation Trust Under Income Tax Act

ITAT condones delay, restores Section 50C appeal after finding denial of adequate hearing by CIT(A).

ITAT Remands Section 50C Addition After Finding Breach of Natural Justice

ITAT allows Section 87A rebate on Section 111A gains for AY 2024-25, rejecting CPC's denial.