ITAT Ahmedabad Quashes Reassessment for No Addition on Recorded Reasons:

ITAT Quashes Reassessment: No Addition on Recorded Reasons, LTCG Addition Invalid
ITAT Ahmedabad Quashes Reassessment: LTCG Addition Invalid

ITAT Ahmedabad Quashes Reassessment for No Addition on Recorded Reasons
The assessee filed a return for AY 2011–12 declaring income of Rs. 4,02,420. The AO reopened the assessment by issuing notice under Section 148 on 30.03.2018, alleging escapement of income relating to immovable property transactions of Rs. 2.08 crore and scrip transactions of Rs. 72.73 lakh.
Relying on ITBA portal data, the AO treated long-term capital gains of Rs. 1.04 crore from shares of Splash Media Ltd. as bogus under Section 68 and added Rs. 5.21 lakh as unexplained commission under Section 69C. The reassessment was completed at Rs. 1.13 crore. The CIT(A) confirmed the additions.
Main Issue: Whether reassessment is valid when no addition is made on the issues recorded in the reasons under Section 148, and additions are made to unrelated issues.
ITAT's Ruling: The ITAT quashed the reassessment. It held that the recorded reasons were confined to alleged immovable property and scrip transactions, on which no additions were ultimately made. No belief of escapement was recorded regarding Splash Media Ltd. shares.
Relying on CIT v. Mohmed Juned Dadani, the Tribunal held that where the very basis of reopening fails, the AO cannot make additions on issues dehors the recorded reasons. Since the reopening rested on an erroneous factual foundation, the reassessment was held to be without jurisdiction and was quashed in its entirety.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2166My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condones 648-Day Delay After Assessee Lost Family During COVID, Restores AppealPremium
- ITAT Quashes Rs 2 Crore Penalty as Time-Barred; Limitation Starts from AO’s Reference, Not Show-Cause NoticePremium
- ITAT Remands Appeal After Finding NFAC Ignored 89 Pages of Evidence on Cash Deposits and Flat Improvement CostPremium
- ITAT Grants Fresh Opportunity in Rs 2.63 Crore Foreign Bank Credit Addition CasePremium
- ITAT Deletes Section 68 Addition on Explained Demonetisation Cash DepositsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








