ITAT Allows Section 80-IAC Deduction Despite Delay in Filing Form 10CCB:

ITAT allows deduction despite delay, holding audit report filing as procedural requirement under law.
Tribunal treats audit report filing as procedural, not mandatory condition

ITAT Allows Section 80-IAC Deduction Despite Delay in Filing Form 10CCB
The assessee company claimed a deduction under Section 80-IAC while filing its return of income within the prescribed due date. However, the required audit report in Form 10CCB was filed with a delay of 43 days, though it was available on record before the return was processed under Section 143(1). The CPC disallowed the deduction solely on the ground that the audit report was not filed within the due date or the extended due date.
The assessee’s rectification application was rejected, and the CIT(A) upheld the disallowance by treating the filing of Form 10CCB within the due date as mandatory. The assessee contended that such a requirement is merely procedural and relied on multiple judicial precedents supporting that delayed filing, if completed during assessment proceedings, should not result in the denial of a deduction.
Issue Raised: Whether the delay in filing Form 10CCB can lead to the denial of the deduction under Section 80-IAC when the form is filed before completion of processing/assessment.
Tribunal Ruling: The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee and held that the deduction under Section 80-IAC cannot be denied merely due to the delayed filing of Form 10CCB. It observed that the audit report was filed within a reasonable time and was available on record before processing of the return under Section 143(1).
The Tribunal held that the requirement of filing such audit reports is procedural in nature. It further noted that the reliance placed by the CIT(A) on contrary decisions was misplaced, as those decisions had either been distinguished or overturned. Since the assessee had complied with the requirement during the pendency of proceedings, the condition stood satisfied. Therefore, the Assessing Officer was directed to allow the deduction.
To Read Full Order, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2198My Recent Articles
- ITAT Sets Aside Order for Denying Assessee Copy of Remand ReportPremium
- High Court Sets Aside Retrospective GST Registration Cancellation for Fresh DecisionPremium
- ITAT Grants BSNL VRS Exemptions Despite Delay, Rejects Technical ObjectionsPremium
- ITAT Deletes Section 271E Penalty on Genuine Cash Repayment Between SpousesPremium
- ITAT Allows Withdrawal of Income Tax Appeal After Assessee Pays Tax DemandPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








