ITAT: Assessment Beyond Excludable Period Under Section 153 Held Time-Barred:

ITAT: Assessment Beyond Excludable Period Under Section 153 Held Time-Barred

Only period falling within limitation window can be excluded; assessment beyond extended date held invalid

Strict Compliance with Statutory Timelines Required Under Section 153 for Valid Assessment

authorMeetu KumaridateMar 3, 2026
Last update on Mar 3, 2026
ITAT: Assessment Beyond Excludable Period Under Section 153 Held Time-Barred The appellant, Srinivasa Reddy Yeturu, challenged an assessment order passed under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment Year 2022-23.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
The primary grievance was that the order, dated September 27, 2024, was passed beyond the prescribed statutory time limit. Under the specific provisions of Section 153, the deadline for completing this assessment was March 31, 2024. However, clause xii of Explanation 1 to Section 153 allows for an extension of time equal to the period lost by the Assessing Officer (AO) while waiting for the physical handing over of seized books of account from the investigation wing. There was a delay of 144 days in the transfer of records. Main Issue: Whether the assessment order passed on September 27, 2024, was legally valid or barred by limitation, after accounting for the 144-day extension permitted due to the delay in handing over seized documents.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
ITAT's Ruling: The ITAT ruled in favor of the taxpayer and quashed the assessment order. The Tribunal calculated that by adding the 144-day extension to the original deadline of March 31, 2024, the revised time limit for passing the assessment order was August 22, 2024. As the AO passed the final order more than a month after the extended deadline,the order was held to be "clearly barred by limitation." The Bench emphasized that statutory timelines are mandatory and any order passed after the expiry of such period is void ab initio. Thus, the entire tax demand arising from the late order was set aside. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

LinkedIn

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2200
Up Next

Loading suggestions…