ITAT Condones Delay in Appeal Filing After Assessee Misses Notices Due to Change in PAN:

The ITAT Bangalore condoned the delay in filing appeals considering that notices issued under an old PAN may go unnoticed after migration to a new PAN.
Delay Excused Due to Transition to New PAN: ITAT

ITAT Condones Delay in Appeal Filing After Assessee Misses Notices Due to Change in PAN
The ITAT Bangalore condoned delays in filing appeals, holding that the assessee’s shift to a new PAN constituted sufficient cause for missing notices under the old PAN. The Tribunal restored the matters to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on merits after examining supporting documents.
The assessee, M/s Hunnur Souhard Credit Sahakari Sangh Niyamit, being a cooperative society, had made cash deposits into its bank account during the year in consideration. Noting the same, the tax authorities had reopened the assessee's case since no income tax returns were found under the old PAN, treating the deposits as unexplained money under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act.
The assessee explained that it had later obtained a new PAN under a different status and had been filing income tax returns using the new PAN. Further claimed that all the impugned cash deposits were properly recorded in the books of accounts and disclosed in the returns filed under the new PAN. Because of this change, the assessee stated that it did not notice the notices and assessment orders issued under the old PAN.
When the assessee approached, the ITAT Ahmedabad observed that when a taxpayer starts using a new PAN, it is possible that communications issued under the old PAN may not be noticed. Considering the same, the tribunal condoned the delay of 142 and 141 days in filing the appeal and remanded the case to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration. The assessee is directed to furnish all relevant documents during the re-hearing. In conclusion, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2587My Recent Articles
- Rs 1.48 Crore Interest on Delayed Property Payments Qualifies as Cost of Acquisition: ITAT DelhiPremium
- ROC Penalises Company and Director Rs 20,000 for Wrong AGM Date in Form AOC-4CFSPremium
- ROC Penalises Company's Eight Directors Over Non-Appointment of Two Independent Directors for FY 2015-16 to 2018-19Premium
- An Inadvertent Typographical Error in Tax Audit Report Should Not Lead to An Unmerited Disallowance, Rules ITATPremium
- 21 CBI Officials Honoured With President’s Medals for Distinguished and Meritorious Service on 80th Independence Day
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts







