ITAT Condones delay in Filing Income Tax Appeal Subject to payment in Prime Minister National Relief Fund:

ITAT Condones delay in Filing Income Tax Appeal Subject to payment in Prime Minister National Relief Fund

The Tribunal quashed the CIT(A)'s order and restored the matter, subject to a payment of a cost of Rs 10,000 to the Prime Minister's National Relief Fund.

ITAT Grants Relief in Time-Barred Appeal

authorNidhidateFeb 5, 2026
Last update on Feb 5, 2026
ITAT Condones delay in Filing Income Tax Appeal Subject to payment in Prime Minister National Relief Fund The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad, gave another opportunity to an assessee in a time-barred appeal case. The assessee, Brijesh Hariprasadbhai Raval, filed an appeal before the CIT(A), which was rejected for being time-barred. The CIT(A) claimed that the appeal was late by 1096 days. The assessee appealed before the ITAT, arguing that the CIT(A) had wrongly calculated the number of days for the delay.
ITAT Ahmedabad deletes major TP additions, limits R&D deduction to DSIR approval
As per the assessee, the appeal was delayed due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The order was passed on 14.10.2019, and the assessee received its copy on 08/03/2022, and the last day to file the appeal against this order was 08/04/2022. However, by this time, the COVID lockdown was announced, and the Supreme Court had announced an extended deadline to file the appeal, which was 29/05/2022. The assessee argued that its appeal, filed on 14/04/2022, was within the extended deadline. And even in normal circumstances, the appeal was delayed by only 7 days (08/04/2022 to 14/04/2022). Further, the assessee argued that even if it is assumed that the order was received on 14/10/2019 and the limitation stopped running from 15/03/2020 as per the Apex court, the delay in filing the appeal can be 120 days.
ITAT Quashes MAT Rectification Order; Debatable MAT Computation Cannot Be Revised u/s 154
The ITAT, citing the interest of justice, ruled that the assessee should get one more opportunity to present his case before the CIT(A). Therefore, the Tribunal quashed the CIT(A)'s order and restored the matter, subject to a payment of a cost of Rs 10,000 to the Prime Minister's National Relief Fund. The CIT(A) will decide the matter on its merits once the assessee shows the payment receipt to the CIT(A).

About Author

LinkedIn

Nidhi

Content Writer

Nidhi is a skilled content writer specializing in personal finance. She creates clear, engaging articles on mutual funds, investments, insurance, and wealth-building strategies. With a passion for simplifying complex financial topics, Nidhi helps readers make informed money decisions with confidence. She can be reached at [email protected]
Studycafe
New Delhi, Delhi, India
1832
Up Next

Loading suggestions…