ITAT Condones Two-Year Delay, Directs CIT(A) to Reconsider Appeal on Merits Citing Genuine Personal Hardship:

Pune ITAT condoned the assessee’s two-year delay citing genuine personal hardship and directed the CIT(A) to decide the appeal afresh on merits.
CIT(A) Directed to Reconsider Appeal

Premium
ITAT Condones Two-Year Delay, Directs CIT(A) to Reconsider Appeal on Merits Citing Genuine Personal Hardship
Pune ITAT condoned the assessee’s two-year delay citing genuine personal hardship and directed the CIT(A) to decide the appeal afresh on merits.
Also Read
ITAT Clarifies Section 271AAD Does Not Empower PCIT or CIT to Initiate Penalty Proceedings Over Alleged False Entry Plant 500 Trees or Face Rs 11.22 Crore Tax Addition: ITAT Gives Final Chance to Assessee, Links Fresh Tax Verification to Tree PlantationITAT Invokes Natural Justice in Rs 23.56 Lakh Demonetisation Cash Dispute on CIT(A)'s Failure to Examine Merits‘Middle Class Is Government’s ATM’: Shehzad Poonawalla Questions Taxes, Public Services
About Author
Vanshika verma
Content Writer
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Studycafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
1774My Recent Articles
- ‘Middle Class Is Government’s ATM’: Shehzad Poonawalla Questions Taxes, Public Services
- ITAT Grants Relief to Farmer, Condoning 147-Day Delay in Appeal Filing Over E-Filing DifficultiesPremium
- ITAT Allows Fresh Chance to Explain Rs 39.47 Lakh Cash Deposits After Assessee Failed to Respond to CIT(A) NoticesPremium
- ITAT Remands Unexplained Cash Deposit and Term Deposit Additions After Non-Compliance at CIT(A) StagePremium
- ITAT Remands Rs 72.90 Lakh Tax Dispute of Taxpayer to CIT(A) After Legal Challenge to Section 148 Notice Remained UndecidedPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts







