ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition as Assessee Had Claimed Short-Term Capital Loss:

ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition as Assessee Had Claimed Short-Term Capital Loss

The ITAT Mumbai held that additions made by the AO were incorrect as it was assumed that assessee claimed exempt Long-Term Capital Gain but the assessee disclosed a Short-Term Capital Loss through penny stock transactions

ITAT Deletes Addition under Section 68 and 69C

authorSaloni KumaridateJun 2, 2026
Last update on Jun 2, 2026
ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition as Assessee Had Claimed Short-Term Capital Loss The assessee filed the return of income for assessment year 2012-13 declaring Rs 6.05 lakh as total income but the Investigating Directorate, Mumbai, provided the information that the assessee is a beneficiary of trading penny stock transactions through M/s Scan Steels Ltd during 2011-12 and the assessment was reopened. The assessee submitted contract notes, demat records and payment statements of Securities Transaction Tax, arguing that the shares were purchased through the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) and resulted in Short-Term Capital Loss of Rs 1.38 lakh.
ITAT Grants Relief of Rs. 2 Lakh Despite Lack of Complete Supporting Evidence
The AO claimed that the assessee had obtained Long-term Capital Gain through these penny stock transactions and made an addition of unexplained cash of Rs 3.02 lakh under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act and further added Rs 11.78 thousand under Section 69C towards alleged commission paid for obtaining accommodation entries. The CIT (A) upheld both the addition made by the AO and held that the transaction lacked commercial substance.
RBI Imposes Rs 3.10 Lakh Penalty on Credit Access Grameen for KYC Lapses.
The ITAT examined all the evidence on record and found out that the AO erroneously proceeded on the assumption that the assessee claimed an exempt Long-Term Capital Gain of Rs 3.92 lakh but the evidence showed that the assessee had rather claimed a Short-Term Capital Loss supported by contract notes and banking records but no material was submitted by the AO to establish his claim and no independent inquiry was conducted.
ITAT Condones 2157-Days Delay, Criticises CIT(A) For Not Hearing Case on Merits and Dismissing Appeal Ex-parte
Accordingly, ITAT held that additions under Section 68 can not be sustained merely on the basis of presumptions without any direct and documented material linking the assessee to the alleged arrangement. The Tribunal held both the additions under Sections 68 and 69C as unsustainable and deleted them. The Appeal of the assessee was allowed.

About Author

LinkedIn

Saloni Kumari

Content Writer

Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2425
Up Next

Loading suggestions…