ITAT Delhi Deletes Rs 5.60 Crore Addition for Demonetisation Cash Deposits Under Section 69A:

ITAT Delhi Deletes Rs 5.60 Crore Addition for Demonetisation Cash Deposits Under Section 69A

ITAT Delhi rules that cash deposits duly reflected in audited books and linked to business transactions cannot be treated as unexplained money merely due to doubts over VAT compliance

ITAT Delhi Holds Recorded Business Receipts Cannot be Taxed u/s 69A

authorSaimadateJun 9, 2026
Last update on Jun 9, 2026
ITAT Delhi Deletes Rs 5.60 Crore Addition for Demonetisation Cash Deposits Under Section 69A The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi has held that cash deposits made during the demonetisation period cannot be treated as unexplained money under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act when the source of such deposits stands recorded in the audited books of account.
RBI Floating Rate Bond Interest Showing Only Half in AIS; Verify Income Before Filing ITR 2026
The assessee, Mr Rakesh Kumar, conducts the business of jewellery and bullion trading under the proprietorship concern M/s R.V. Gold Hallmark. During the demonetisation period, he deposited cash amounting to Rs 5.60 crore in his bank account. The case was selected for limited scrutiny on account of substantial cash deposits.
HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Alleged Panchayat Funds Embezzlement Case
During assessment proceedings, the assessee explained that the deposits represented cash advances received from customers prior to 8 November 2016 for the purchase of gold bullion. The AO issued summons under Section 131 to certain customers, and none of the summoned persons appeared. The Assessing Officer concluded that the alleged business activity was not genuine and treated the entire cash deposit of Rs 5.60 crore as unexplained money under Section 69A. The addition was also subjected to tax under Section 115BBE. The CIT(A) affirmed the assessment made by AO.
Reliance Infra Bank Accounts Face Rs 77.86 Crore Lien After Customs Appeals Order
The Tribunal observed that the assessee had maintained books of account, cash books, sales records, stock details and audited financial statements. It was also observed that the assessee had furnished a detailed cash account statement explaining the source of deposits, including customer advances, cash balance and other receipts. These transactions were accordingly reflected in the books of account. Allowing the appeal, the Tribunal held that the source of cash deposits had been satisfactorily explained and the provisions of Section 69A were not attracted. Accordingly, the addition of Rs 5.60 crore made under Section 69A was deleted.

About Author

Saima

Content Writer

Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
132
Up Next

Loading suggestions…