ITAT Quashes 37% Surcharge on Employee Welfare Trust; Normal AOP Rates to Apply

Trust formed exclusively for employees falls under Section 164(1)(iv); maximum marginal rate and surcharge under Section 167B held inapplicable.

ITAT Mumbai: No 37% Surcharge on Employee Welfare Trust Taxed as AOP

Meetu Kumari | Jan 8, 2026 |

ITAT Quashes 37% Surcharge on Employee Welfare Trust; Normal AOP Rates to Apply

ITAT Quashes 37% Surcharge on Employee Welfare Trust; Normal AOP Rates to Apply

Deloitte Employees Welfare Trust, a private trust formed exclusively for the welfare of employees of Deloitte, filed its return for AY 2022-23 as an AOP, offering interest income from fixed deposits and paying tax at normal AOP rates.

While processing the return under Section 143(1), the CPC applied tax at the maximum marginal rate with 37% surcharge under Section 167B, resulting in a demand. The CIT(A) upheld the action.

Issue Before Tribunal: Whether an employee welfare trust covered by clause (iv) of the first proviso to Section 164(1) is taxable at the maximum marginal rate under Section 167B, and whether surcharge at 37% is leviable when income is below Rs. 50 lakh.

ITAT Ruled: The ITAT allowed the appeal. It held that the assessee is a bona fide employee welfare trust falling within the exception under Section 164(1)(iv) and, therefore, outside the scope of Section 167B. Such trusts are taxable at normal AOP rates.

Relying on CBDT Circular No. 577 and judicial precedents, the Tribunal further held that surcharge was not leviable since the income was below Rs. 50 lakh. The Assessing Officer was directed to recompute tax accordingly.

To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
High Court Upholds Validity of GST Late Fees: Distinguishes ‘Fees’ from ‘Tax’ and ‘Penalty’ Delhi High Court Suspends CA for One Year Over BFSL IPO Irregularities High Court Reads Down Section 16(2)(c) CGST Act; Bona Fide Purchasers Cannot Be Denied ITC 7 Hidden Charges That May Add Lakhs to Your Home Loan in 2026 ITAT Quashes 37% Surcharge on Employee Welfare Trust; Normal AOP Rates to ApplyView All Posts